I have found that most texts use examples (eg. particular situations) to introduce or explain something, but my problem is that if an example sentence can refer to the present or future, what the time of the example sentence is.
For example:
"If A owns two pieces of land and later sub-leases one piece to B (condition-clause), A may impose covenants on B (result-clause).
These covenants will be enforceable by A or his successor in title against B."
The first sentence: the condition-clause is in the present simple, but it can also refer to the future as "will" is normally omitted from if-clauses. The result-clause contains a non-action verb "impose". Thus, "may impose" can mean "perhaps, imposes" in the present or mean "perhaps, will impose" in the future.
The second sentence: it can refer to the present as "will" can mean "can" in the present. It can also refer to the future as according to the context, the act in the second sentence is subject to the result-clause in the first sentence.
So how can I interpret the time of the example sentences?
Please help. Thanks
For example:
"If A owns two pieces of land and later sub-leases one piece to B (condition-clause), A may impose covenants on B (result-clause).
These covenants will be enforceable by A or his successor in title against B."
The first sentence: the condition-clause is in the present simple, but it can also refer to the future as "will" is normally omitted from if-clauses. The result-clause contains a non-action verb "impose". Thus, "may impose" can mean "perhaps, imposes" in the present or mean "perhaps, will impose" in the future.
The second sentence: it can refer to the present as "will" can mean "can" in the present. It can also refer to the future as according to the context, the act in the second sentence is subject to the result-clause in the first sentence.
So how can I interpret the time of the example sentences?
Please help. Thanks