[Grammar] I'd rather..

Status
Not open for further replies.

wace

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
Italy
I understand the expression 'I'd rather' is followed by the infinitive if the subject is the same : 'I'd rather stay at home tonight.'
If, however, the subject of the verb following the expression is different, the Past Simple must be used. 'I'd rather you stayed at home'.
A couple of days ago, however, I came across this sentence in a book:
'I'd rather it be them'. Personally I would have used 'I'd rather it were/was them.'
Is the use of the present subjunctive in the above sentence an alternative or do you recommend using the Past Simple anyway?
Thanks.

P.S. The book I mentioned is SAVING ALICE by David Lewis.
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
I understand the expression 'I'd rather' is followed by the infinitive if the subject is the same : 'I'd rather stay at home tonight.'
If, however, the subject of the verb following the expression is different, the Past Simple must be used. 'I'd rather you stayed at home'.
A couple of days ago, however, I came across this sentence in a book:
'I'd rather it be them'. Personally I would have used 'I'd rather it were/was them.'
Is the use of the present subjunctive in the above sentence an alternative or do you recommend using the Past Simple anyway?
Thanks.

P.S. The book I mentioned is SAVING ALICE by David Lewis.

I don't know this author, or this book. Can you give a bit more of the context?
 

wace

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
Italy
I don't know this author, or this book. Can you give a bit more of the context?

Ok Bhai.. here's the bit preceding the sentence:

...Although I resembled my father, I'd acquired my mother's reasonable nose. She did, however, have giant feet for her size. For years I'd monitor my nose carefully every morning, going so far as to measure its length to settle my fears. Sometimes I measured my feet too, relieved when they seemed to be growing. If something had to stick out, I'd rather it be them.'
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
Ok Bhai.. here's the bit preceding the sentence:

...Although I resembled my father, I'd acquired my mother's reasonable nose. She did, however, have giant feet for her size. For years I'd monitor my nose carefully every morning, going so far as to measure its length to settle my fears. Sometimes I measured my feet too, relieved when they seemed to be growing. If something had to stick out, I'd rather it be them.'

I think that in the context of the narrative it sounds fine.
 

wace

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
Italy
I think that in the context of the narrative it sounds fine.

Well, I'm sure it does, Bhai... No English-speaking author would ever use an awkward-sounding turn of phrase, would they? My question was (and still is): would the Past Simple have sounded just as fine?
I'd rather it was/were them
In all of my reference books no mention is made of the present subjunctive with the expression I'd rather... hence my question.
Thank you.
 

BobK

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Location
Spencers Wood, near Reading, UK
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Well, I'm sure it does, Bhai... No English-speaking author would ever use an awkward-sounding turn of phrase, would they? My question was (and still is): would the Past Simple have sounded just as fine?
I'd rather it was/were them
In all of my reference books no mention is made of the present subjunctive with the expression I'd rather... hence my question.
Thank you.

That surprises me. It's perfectly normal, and preferred in some parts of the world. I wouldn't use 'be' there, but I know a lot of people who would.

To emphasize, if appropriate, that I was referring to a hypothetical event, I might also say 'I'd rather that they should be the ones to ...'.

b
 

wace

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
Italy
That surprises me. It's perfectly normal, and preferred in some parts of the world. I wouldn't use 'be' there, but I know a lot of people who would.

To emphasize, if appropriate, that I was referring to a hypothetical event, I might also say 'I'd rather that they should be the ones to ...'.

b

... And I am surprised I haven't been able to find one single example containing the present subjunctive in any of the reference books I have including Martin Hewings' Advanced Grammar in Use (Cambridge University Press)
Quote:
In unreal conditional sentences we can use were, including first and third person subjects [...] After would rather and would sooner when we talk about preferences:
- I feel embarrassed about what happened and would rather the event were forgotten.

- 'I've arranged a meeting for the end of July'. 'I'd sooner it were earlier'.

Unquote.

Again, no mention of the present subjunctive option. Would 'be' have been all right in the two sentences above?

Thank you!
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
... And I am surprised I haven't been able to find one single example containing the present subjunctive in any of the reference books I have including Martin Hewings' Advanced Grammar in Use (Cambridge University Press)
Quote:
In unreal conditional sentences we can use were, including first and third person subjects [...] After would rather and would sooner when we talk about preferences:
- I feel embarrassed about what happened and would rather the event were forgotten.

- 'I've arranged a meeting for the end of July'. 'I'd sooner it were earlier'.

Unquote.

Again, no mention of the present subjunctive option. Would 'be' have been all right in the two sentences above?

Thank you!

It certainly looks alright in the first example, for some reason I like it less in the second, but I'm sure both would be used.
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I understand the expression 'I'd rather' is followed by the infinitive if the subject is the same : 'I'd rather stay at home tonight.'
If, however, the subject of the verb following the expression is different, the Past Simple must be used. 'I'd rather you stayed at home'.
A couple of days ago, however, I came across this sentence in a book:
'I'd rather it be them'. Personally I would have used 'I'd rather it were/was them.'
Is the use of the present subjunctive in the above sentence an alternative or do you recommend using the Past Simple anyway?
Thanks.

P.S. The book I mentioned is SAVING ALICE by David Lewis.

********** NOT a teacher **********

Hello.

(1) May I add my two cents?

(2) After surfing the Web and checking my books, I have reached

some conclusions:

(a) You are correct: most books suggest the past subjunctive (were)

or past indicative (was) after would rather.

(b) The present subjunctive is definitely not "wrong," though.

(i) One gentleman who identifies himself as the co-founder of an

English advice website assured one learner that all three are

"correct":

I would rather she be here. (present subjunctive)

I would rather she were here. (past subjunctive)

I would rather she was here. (My note: similar to people

who say I wish I was handsome instead of I wish I were handsome.)

(c) It is helpful to remember that I would rather = I prefer to.

(i) As some books remind us, prefer in American English definitely

uses the present subjunctive:

He prefers that the shoes be ready. (An example from the third edition of

Mr. Fowler's revered Modern English Usage.)

(d) A possible conclusion: Contrary to what many grammar books say,

the present subjunctive is possible after would rather, but it is probably

correct to conclude that it is a little too elegant for today's ordinary

English.

THANK YOU
 

wace

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
Italy
Brilliant!!!!!!! Thank you very much, The Parser.
Your enlightening explanation has finally shed some light on a grammar point I've been puzzling over for days.
Some fellow native teachers of yours sometimes lack the patience to delve into a topic the way you did. However, my thanks go to all those who have contributed to this thread with their valued opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top