"lived" or "had lived"?

Status
Not open for further replies.

HighPriest

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
Which sounds more natural (or/and correct)?
1. Where did you live before you came to London?
2. Where had you lived before you came to London?
 

Allen165

Key Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Switzerland
NOT A TEACHER.

The first sentence is correct and sounds more natural. I don't know if there are any circumstances under which the second sentence would be correct.
 

Kintzacos

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Romanian
Home Country
Romania
Current Location
Romania
Which sounds more natural (or/and correct)?
1. Where did you live before you came to London?
2. Where had you lived before you came to London?

Hi,

I think the first sentence sounds more natural , because the action that he did before coming to London is in the past. So I think you should use Past Simple.

I'm not so sure about my answer so you could correct it if I'm wrong.:)
 

HighPriest

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
Thanks, guys, my thoughts exactly:)
 

cubezero3

Member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
NOT A TEACHER.

The first sentence is correct and sounds more natural. I don't know if there are any circumstances under which the second sentence would be correct.

Hello, Jasmin165.

I remember the main function of the past perfect tense is to indicate an action happened before another past action. Here the question is about the listener's whereabouts before he or she came to london, which is a past action.

I guess people could use both. However, the first one might be preferable, since the use of before itself sufficiently indicates the relationship in time and therefore makes the use of had here clumzy and unnecessary.

I am very likely to be wrong. Please correct me if so.

Thanks

Richard
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
Which sounds more natural (or/and correct)?
1. Where did you live before you came to London?
2. Where had you lived before you came to London?
Both are correct. The difference is that the first one uses the auxiliary "did" so the verb "to live" stays in the the bare infinitive.
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Which sounds more natural (or/and correct)?
1. Where did you live before you came to London?
2. Where had you lived before you came to London?



NOT A TEACHER

Maybe it depends on how long the person has been living in London.

If the person has been living in London for two weeks, I would feel

more comfortable asking: Where did you live before you came here?

If the person has been living in London for five years, I would be

more comfortable in saying something like:

I have been asked to write a short biographical note about you, so

I have to ask a few personal questions. Would you kindly tell me where

you had lived before you came to the capital?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top