as if she was vs as if she were

Status
Not open for further replies.

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
1)"She loves her as if she were her own daughter.''

OR

2)"She loves her as if she was here own daughter."

The first sentence is grammatically correct. But I get to hear pople saying sentences like the second one among native speakers.
 

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
Both are grammatically correct.
Some grammar textbooks(old ones) say that it's compulsory to use "were".
If "was" used, it would be considered incorrect...?
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
Some grammar textbooks(old ones) say that it's compulsory to use "were".
If "was" used, it would be considered incorrect...?
#1 is correct.
 

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
No, the second one isn't correct.

So the second one would be marked incorrect on the writing test. What about the colloquial use?
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
So the second one would be marked incorrect on the writing test. What about the colloquial use?
It is used colloquially by people who are not careful with language.
 

Chicchick

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
'were' is more proper

'was' is acceptable in modern times

(Check out a Headway text book.)
 
Last edited:

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
'were' is more proper

'was' is acceptable in modern times

(Check out a Headway text book)

That's why I've been on this website. "old grammar texbooks'' tend to consider something incorrect,whereas new ones say it's Ok to use it.
 

Chicchick

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
I would use 'were'.

I think that it sounds much better.

English is a 'dynamic language' - that means it changes over time.

When you see the word 'rhetoric' used in literature six hundred years ago it means 'full of meaning' and now it means 'empty of meaning'.

I once had a student who used the word 'thrice' in conversation.
This is the danger of using really old books.
 
Last edited:

riquecohen

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
Brazil
I agree with bhaisahab´s posts in this thread.
With regard to the grammar books, it´s clear that languages are constantly evolving, however I´m not ready to give up on the proper use of the subjunctive.
 

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
I agree with bhaisahab´s posts in this thread.
With regard to the grammar books, it´s clear that languages are constantly evolving, however I´m not ready to give up on the proper use of the subjunctive.

Sure thing on a writing test you stick to proper grammar but when you talk to your friends you might make "tiny mistakes" that nobody would notice;-)?
 

Pedroski

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
China
"I´m not ready to give up on the proper use of the subjunctive."

I don't think you can 'give up' the subjunctive: it is needed in language. All that happens is, the written form is changing/haschanged.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top