Originally Posted by X Mode
Yes. We're not talking about dialects here.

Other
Close...
Originally Posted by X Mode
Yes. We're not talking about dialects here.
Just quality native speaker usage.Originally Posted by X Mode
Originally Posted by MrPedantic
And what would you say about a speaker that says it? Would you tell a student that it's wrong and something you can't say?
I think that's a very restrictive way of viewing language. It sends the wrong message to ESL/EFL students about how they are able to use English.Originally Posted by MrPedantic
I don't think it means little more than that. If that's what someone wants to say, then someone will say it. Such a statement of comparison could very well be taken literally. It could be rhetorical, but not necessarily.
The following two statements are not the same. They mean different things.
That's even more unnecessary than it is undesirable.
That's as much unnecessary as it is undesirable.
Last edited by Steven D; 05-Jul-2005 at 13:07.
The context is what gives logic to the utterance. If anyone were to say to me "You say food is necessary to life, but how necessary is it?", I would think they were nuts. If someone said "You say standard grammar study is necessary to life, but how necessary is it?", I would find that need for qualification quite acceptable. Why? Because the first is not based on a subjective viewpoint, but the second is.
Yes.Originally Posted by M56
And it seems that some posters can't separate their ideas about what they think is good writing from spoken language. They're far too critical. And I don't think these posters actually live up to the standards of how they think English should be "spoken" in reality.
Hello X ModeOriginally Posted by X Mode
I'd be inclined to agree. The difference resides in the construction:
1. as...as it is...
2. more...than it is...
A circle or square is as wide as it is tall.
A rectangle is wider (= more wide) than it is tall, or taller (= more tall) than it is wide.
MrP
If a student asked me, I would point out that the 'as much...as it is' construction has an element of redundancy, except in cases such as the one I mentioned earlier.Originally Posted by X Mode
If the student then said, "Well, MrP, I rather like this construction, and find your approach overly restrictive; so up yours", I would say, Good luck to you, my friend.
MrP
Have you got these the wrong way around?Originally Posted by MrPedantic
<1. as...as it is...
2. more...than it is...>
?2. That's even more unnecessary than it is undesirable.
?1. That's as much unnecessary as it is undesirable.