vil
Key Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Bulgarian
- Home Country
- Bulgaria
- Current Location
- Bulgaria
Dear teachers,
I know that a participial construction introduced by the participle “being” or “having been” may denote a cause for the state or action expressed in the main clause.
Being young and husky, I wanted a little time for myself.
Being tired I decided to turn in.
Being in a hurry I could not stop to talk to him.
Having been asked to go, I could not very well refuse.
Being a small boy he could not very well understand he meaning of it all.
Would you tell me why the participle “being” or “having been” is generally not used instead of an adverbial clause of time?
When I was in London, I had a chance to visit the Tate Gallery.
When he was a boy, he would spend all his days on the seashore.
Thanks for your efforts.
Regards,
V
I know that a participial construction introduced by the participle “being” or “having been” may denote a cause for the state or action expressed in the main clause.
Being young and husky, I wanted a little time for myself.
Being tired I decided to turn in.
Being in a hurry I could not stop to talk to him.
Having been asked to go, I could not very well refuse.
Being a small boy he could not very well understand he meaning of it all.
Would you tell me why the participle “being” or “having been” is generally not used instead of an adverbial clause of time?
When I was in London, I had a chance to visit the Tate Gallery.
When he was a boy, he would spend all his days on the seashore.
Thanks for your efforts.
Regards,
V