Results 1 to 5 of 5
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • German
      • Home Country:
      • Germany
      • Current Location:
      • Sweden

    • Join Date: Feb 2008
    • Posts: 1,638
    #1

    had back

    Hi

    That's because he got the evidence that Mr Clark had back.

    Is it possible that "had back" means "came back"? Mr Clark came back.

    For example, is it OK to say: He had back home, meaning he came back home?

  1. riquecohen's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • Brazil

    • Join Date: Aug 2010
    • Posts: 6,002
    #2

    Re: had back

    Quote Originally Posted by GUEST2008 View Post
    Hi

    That's because he got the evidence that Mr Clark had back. Do you mean "........that Mr. Clark had received?

    Is it possible that "had back" means "came back"?No Mr Clark came back.This sentence is correct, but note that "came back" does not mean "had back." "Mr. Clark had come back" is possible. Context is important.
    For example, is it OK to say: He had back home, meaning he came back home?No. "He had come back home" is possible. Again, what is the context?

    "Had back" in your context does not make sense. My modifications are just based on guesses. Can you provide more information?

  2. BobK's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2006
    • Posts: 16,038
    #3

    Re: had back

    Quote Originally Posted by GUEST2008 View Post
    Hi

    That's because he got the evidence that Mr Clark had back.

    Is it possible that "had back" means "came back"? Mr Clark came back.

    For example, is it OK to say: He had back home, meaning he came back home?
    There are two possibilities:
    • Typo: 'he got the evidence that Mr Clark had come back.' [That is, the evidence was about Mr Clark coming back]
    • Mr Clark had previously sent the evidence away; later he 'had it back', and gave it to whoever was mentioned in the sentence as 'he'. [That is, the evidence was something else]


    I'd guess the first was more likely, but the context would make it clear.

    b

    PS And to answer your last question, no it's not. Some variants (e.g. Scottish English) use a preposition to imply a verb (like 'I'm away home'); but I've never heard a preposition used to imply 'come'.
    Last edited by BobK; 17-Nov-2010 at 12:44. Reason: PS added

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • German
      • Home Country:
      • Germany
      • Current Location:
      • Sweden

    • Join Date: Feb 2008
    • Posts: 1,638
    #4

    Re: had back

    Hi

    The CIA agent talks to a certain girl about her friend he's looking for. That guy probably killed two other guys.

    She says: Oliver (her friend) talked to Gray (CIA chief whom he killed some time later) and a day later Gray resigned from his post, so it must've been pretty incriminating.

    Then the agents says: But then Gray got his old position back.

    She says: That's because he got the evidence that Oliver had back.

    The agent says: The Capitol Visitor Center? (this is where Oliver probably killed a few agents some time ago in the past)

    I think it should be: had come back.

    When Gray found out that Oliver came back he also came back to his post. Maybe they had a deal: I disappear and you disappear too, I don't know.
    Last edited by GUEST2008; 17-Nov-2010 at 13:12.

  3. Munch's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Aug 2010
    • Posts: 479
    #5

    Re: had back

    EDIT: I was slow - this was written before the post above.

    I understood the sentence in the way described in BobK's second possibility.

    It seems grammatically correct but clumsy to me:

    • He got the evidence back.
    • Which evidence?
    • The evidence that Mr Clark had.
    • So, he got the evidence that Mr Clark had back.


    If I am correct, you can re-write the sentence this way:

    • That's because he got back the evidence that Mr Clark had.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-May-2009, 11:59
  2. Draw back/Fall back/Back off?
    By sambistapt in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24-Apr-2008, 19:46
  3. Two infinitive phrases back-to-back...
    By Unregistered in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 23-Mar-2008, 16:40
  4. England fight back/fights back ?
    By Donny in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 24-Apr-2006, 03:56
  5. the difference and common between Back down and back off
    By english-learner in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-Apr-2005, 00:08

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •