Interested in Language
Could anyone please tell me whether the following usage of "hereinafter..." is correct?
(1) ABC Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Party A") shall ...
(2) ABC Co., Ltd. (hereinafter as "Party A") shall ...
(3) ABC Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, "Party A") shall ...
I understand (1) is correct.
I have seen (2) and (3) and I wondered if they are correct.
Thank you so much.
If it is grammaticaly fine, it is enough for me, for now.
As a retired major international contracts specialist, I would agree with fivejedjon, with the rider that 2) could potentially be acceptable in the case of Party B, if preceded by 1) for Party A, with the "referred to" being omitted to avoid duplicate wording.
Hope this helps
Now I understand very well. Thank you so much!
(I learned a new word "rider". )
Thank you again.
What if the situation is not legal?
The UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (hereinafter "UNESCO") is ...