comma question "so that"

Status
Not open for further replies.

hebrews110

New member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I know that so uses a comma when it is used as a conjunction as in, "I didn't know what to do, so I gave it to him." But what if it is used to mean "so that." For instance: "I gave it to him so he would stop pestering me." Does that so take a comma?
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
I know that so uses a comma when it is used as a conjunction as in, "I didn't know what to do, so I gave it to him." But what if it is used to mean "so that." For instance: "I gave it to him so he would stop pestering me." Does that so take a comma?
No, "I gave it to him so (that) he would stop pestering me" doesn't need a comma.
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I know that so uses a comma when it is used as a conjunction as in, "I didn't know what to do, so I gave it to him." But what if it is used to mean "so that." For instance: "I gave it to him so he would stop pestering me." Does that so take a comma?


:!::!::!: NOT A TEACHER :!::!::!:


I was taught that it's helpful to use a comma if so that introduces

a clause of result.

(1) He ran so that he might catch the train. No comma should

be used because so that introduces a clause of purpose (gives the

reason for his running).

(2) He ran, so that he caught the train. So that introduces a clause of

result. That is, it tells what happened as a result of his running. The


comma is necessary because it indicates the pause that is necessary in

speech.

THANK YOU & HAVE A NICE DAY.

Notes: (1) Your native language is English, so you already know that

many of us native speakers drop the "that" in sentences such as

No. l and No. 2.

(2) I wish to credit those two example sentences to A Grammar of

Present-Day English by Professors Pence and Emery.
 

ihop

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hindi
Home Country
India
Current Location
United States
Hi Parser,

Why can't we say...

He ran, because of that he caught the train instead of He ran, so that he caught the train.

He ran, so that he caught the train - Sounds different not common.

Am I correct?
 

lauralie2

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2009
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
China
Hi Parser,

Why can't we say...

He ran, because of that he caught the train instead of He ran, so that he caught the train.

He ran, so that he caught the train - Sounds different not common.

Am I correct?
Agreed. The second one, while correct, doesn't sound like modern English to me either.

I'd say:

1. He ran to catch the train. <purpose>
2. He ran and so he caught the train. <result>
 

ihop

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hindi
Home Country
India
Current Location
United States
Thanks!
Now both the sentences sound better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top