Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. Newbie
    Student or Learner
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Lithuanian
      • Home Country:
      • Lithuania
      • Current Location:
      • Lithuania

    • Join Date: Dec 2010
    • Posts: 1

    Exclamation semantic continuum?

    can anyone tell me more about the semantic continuum of English phrasal verbs (their meaning)

  2. Johnson_F's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • England

    • Join Date: Dec 2010
    • Posts: 195

    Re: semantic continuum?

    To me the semantic continuum of phrasal verbs means the progression from what we might call non-phrasal verb constructions to full-blown phrasal verbs:

    1. As I came in to the room, Mary looked up.
    2. As a child, I always looked up to my older sister.
    3a. I’ll look you up when I am next in town.
    3b. I had to look up ‘continuum’ in my dictionary.

    In #1, the words ‘look’ and ‘up’ retain their literal meanings. I doubt if anybody would consider the underlined words to be an example of a phrasal verb.

    In #2, the words have taken on a metaphorical meaning. The ‘Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (2000) considers ‘look up to’ (= admire/respect) to be a phrasal verb.

    In #3a and b, we have moved some way from the literal meanings of ‘look’ and ‘up’. These are what I have called ‘full-blown’ phrasal verbs.

    This continuum is similar to that of Celce-Murcia and Larsen-Freeman (1999): Literal, Aspectual and Idiomatic Phrasal Verbs

    Some writers class such constructions as ‘look at’ (= turn your eyes towards) and go in(to) (= enter) as phrasal verbs. If you agree with such a classification, then you would presumably have a new category 2; and 3a and b would become 4a and b.

    Some writers, e.g. Carter and McCarthy (2006), class as prepositional verbs those which “consist of a verb and a preposition which are closely linked with each other’. Their examples include such verbs as ‘deal’ with, which Sinclair (1990) considers to be a phrasal verb. These would presumably come immediately after my #1.

    Another personal view is that of Phil White: "The whole issue of multi-word verbs is, however, fraught, and there seems to me to be a continuum between phrasals, prepositional verbs and verb + preposition combinations, with the borderlines subject to blurring."

    Carter, Ronald & McCarty, Michael (2006) Cambridge Grammar of English, Cambridge: CUP
    Celce-Murcia, Marianne and Larsen- Freeman, Diane (1999) The Grammar Book, Second Edition, Boston, Mass: Heinle & Heinle.
    Sinclair, John [Editor-in-Chief] (1990) Collins Cobuild English Grammar, London: HarperCollins
    Wehmeier, Sally [Editor] (2000); Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary: Oxford: OUP
    White, Phil: Posting on: - View topic - Separating prepositions from verbs

    See also:
    References to a continuum of opaqueness in:
    The gradability of idiomaticity in: Verbal idioms in focus - towards the continuum of idiomatic expressions. (Linguistics). - Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: international review of English Studies | HighBeam Research - FREE trial

Similar Threads

  1. thesis and semantic
    By sio in forum Teaching English
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 28-Dec-2008, 16:57
  2. semantic??
    By I want to learn in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-Jul-2008, 13:47
  3. Representing Types of Syllabus on a Continuum
    By ELT student in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 31-May-2008, 15:19
  4. semantic
    By kohyoongliat in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-Feb-2007, 11:28
  5. Semantic frames.
    By M56 in forum Text Analysis and Statistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30-Jan-2005, 11:28


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts