question tag

Status
Not open for further replies.

Muflih N

New member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Indonesian
Home Country
Indonesia
Current Location
Indonesia
My students asked me why the tag of I am .... is aren't I?
I told them that that is the way English people say. Language is based on social agreement. Is it correct or are there any other explanation?

Thanks a lot.
Muflih N.
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I don't know the reason that I am not" is contracted as "I'm not" but not "I amn't" -- but for whatever the reason, there is no "I amn't" in most dialects of English.

Therefore, you can't do the inverse and say "Amn't I" for questions.

Aren't I good enough for you?
Aren't I the the best person for the job?
I'm going, aren't I?

If they think this is just too weird, they can say "am I not?" instead.
 

BobK

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Location
Spencers Wood, near Reading, UK
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
My students asked me why the tag of I am .... is aren't I?
I told them that that is the way English people say. Language is based on social agreement. Is it correct or are there any other explanation?

Thanks a lot.
Muflih N.

It's the way they talk, you're right. There is the less grammatically-troublesome 'Am I not?'; indeed there was a time when it was OK to say 'Am not I?' - but not now.

There are some dialects in which 'I am' is rendered as 'I be'; the negative, in these dialects, the negative is 'I bain't'. It seems to me that this could be the root of the widely used and useful 'ain't'.

Anyway, whatever the case, here's an account of what I think might be going on. Prescriptivists often 'correct' users of 'I ain't'. Their unfortunate disciples know that /eɪnt/ is going to cause friction, so instead of <dipthong> + nt they go for <long_vowel> + nt : /a:nt/. When written, this becomes 'aren't'.

But you're right: it's just what people say.

b
 

BobK

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Location
Spencers Wood, near Reading, UK
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
After seeing Barb's post, I should add that there was a time when 'Am not I' was OK and did become 'amn't'. The /m/ was assimilated by the /n/. (In fact, maybe this is the root of 'ain't', and my mentioning of 'bain't' was not only fanciful but also unnecessary ;-))

b
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Language is based on social agreement. I think the origins may lie with ease of pronunciation- amn't does occur in some dialects, but it isn't easy to say.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
Language is based on social agreement. I think the origins may lie with ease of pronunciation- amn't does occur in some dialects, but it isn't easy to say.
It's also worth noting that, although the form looks strange, the pronunciation puts it alongside: can/can't, shall/shan't, am/aren't.

In all three the final consonant of the affirmative form is dropped, as it is also in will/won't.
 

lauralie2

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2009
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
China
I don't know the reason that I am not" is contracted as "I'm not" but not "I amn't"
It is, though. The modern day form of "I amn't" is "I ain't." (From what I remember,amn't became an't, aan't, later aren't, ain't.)


_______________________________
If "ain't I?" is objected to, surely "aren't I?" is very much worse. [Lady Grove, "The Social Fetich," 1907]
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
And you can't argue with Lady Grove, who believes that those who are guilty of inviting you to "take" food or drink would be capable of taking your umbrella (umberella they would pronounce it), so deadly a sin it is. I'd never thought of labelling collocations I didn't like as sinful and only used by the criminal classes- I must remember that.

What a fascinating book- thanks for alerting me to it. I'd never come across her name before. ;-)
 

Muflih N

New member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Indonesian
Home Country
Indonesia
Current Location
Indonesia
Thank you so much,

your explanations are so helpful for English is a foreign language for me and my mother tongue is Indonesia ... :-D
 

orangutan

Member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Great Britain
Current Location
Russian Federation
After seeing Barb's post, I should add that there was a time when 'Am not I' was OK and did become 'amn't'. The /m/ was assimilated by the /n/. (In fact, maybe this is the root of 'ain't', and my mentioning of 'bain't' was not only fanciful but also unnecessary ;-))

b


I believe you are spot on - "ain't" was actually the contraction for "am not". It later got over-generalized for the other persons (as still in many dialects), and then, by reaction, stigmatized until it disappeared from standard English.
 

whynot?

New member
Joined
Nov 27, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Vietnamese
Home Country
Vietnam
Current Location
Vietnam
My students asked me why the tag of I am .... is aren't I?
I told them that that is the way English people say. Language is based on social agreement. Is it correct or are there any other explanation?

Thanks a lot.
Muflih N.

I think there's a reasonable way to explain.
According to the rule of making tag questions, NOT must be used in the contraction form "N ' T". However, there's no such a contraction form for 'AM NOT', and that's the reason for us to use "AREN'T I" instead.
But it's my personal idea to contribute only. ;-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top