.
Personally, I would not touch #1 with a ten-foot parser. Isn't 'unnecessary' non-gradable (lexically speaking, that is)?
.
.
M56
Guest
In which situation would you, personally, use number one over number two?
1. This is as much unnecessary as it is undesirable.
2. This is as unnecessary as it is undesirable.
.
Personally, I would not touch #1 with a ten-foot parser. Isn't 'unnecessary' non-gradable (lexically speaking, that is)?
.
.
I see.Originally Posted by Mister Micawber
<Isn't 'unnecessary' non-gradable (lexically speaking, that is)? >
It may be, but pragmatically...
Do you ever use "it is extremely unnecessary"?
Last edited by M56; 01-Jul-2005 at 12:39.
How about:Originally Posted by Mister Micawber
TOTALLY UNNECESSARY
PROBABLY UNNECESSARY
COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY
ONLY UNNECESSARY
OFTEN UNNECESSARY
ALSO UNNECESSARY
WHOLLY UNNECESSARY
SO UNNECESSARY
BOTH UNNECESSARY
ENTIRELY UNNECESSARY
EVEN UNNECESSARY
HOW UNNECESSARY
AS UNNECESSARY
A BIT UNNECESSARY
LARGELY UNNECESSARY
Etc.
And:
How Necessary is Oxygen?
How necessary is it for me to "bubble" my Earth Juice?
Last edited by M56; 01-Jul-2005 at 16:41.
Originally Posted by M56
Of course. - nothing wrong with those.
That was absolutely unnecessary.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...unnecessary%22+
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...2+&btnG=Search
Last edited by Steven D; 01-Jul-2005 at 22:11. Reason: typo
Thanks for the links, xmode. What do you think of this?
In which situation would you, personally, use number one over number two?
1. This is as much unnecessary as it is undesirable.
2. This is as unnecessary as it is undesirable.
To me, number 1 is for emphasis. You have stronger feelings about something with that statement. Number 1 could be heard as having more emotion attached to it. That's the way it seems to go often. Choices are often made based on emphasis and relative degrees of formality and informality. There are other things I guess, but those seem to come up quite often.Originally Posted by M56
The speaker may or may not be aware that he or she is making these choices. It depends.
Last edited by Steven D; 02-Jul-2005 at 04:46.
A student used "more foremost" as a comparative in her writing. Now, I could tell something was wrong with that. It just didn't sound right. And sure enough, it's not gradable.
Has anyone memorized that list of adjectives?
Last edited by Steven D; 02-Jul-2005 at 04:59.
That's exactly as I see it. What worries me is when native speakers reject such constructions because they demand that the adjective in question is absolute... ungradable.Originally Posted by X Mode
Originally Posted by M56
If an adjective is not gradable, and someone uses it as a gradable adjective, I believe I'll notice it. In other words, I can separate language which does not sound good because it is not usual, and probably incorrect, and language which might seem to be "not okay" in a rather small "technical" way, but in reality really is - OKAY.
So it seems that although "unnecessary" is an ungradable adjective, it can be modified with an extreme adverb. However, I would not do the same, for example, with "foremost".
I can hear myself saying "that was completely unnecessary". - no problem. If one says there's something wrong with it, this, in my opinion, means that one learned English after having acquired it as a first language. One should trust that one speaks correctly. I'm not relearning anything, thank you - if you know what I mean. My language is correct.
Last edited by Steven D; 02-Jul-2005 at 11:38.