I have difficulty understanding the following two passages. Would you please do me a favor?
1. To what extent do male journalists regard their female colleagues as
deviating from these norms in their approaches to validating objective
2. In attempting to prioritize for discussion the ‘objective’ journalist’s claim of
referential transparency, this issue of how relations of patriarchy inform
the ‘discipline of objectivity’ as a seemingly apolitical normative ideal is
Thanks a lot.
1-- Do men newspaper writers think women newspaper writers have a different way of proving statements?
2-- When you try to state the importance of clear references by a journalist, you must consider how the OB network affects this attitude.
...or something to that effect.