Results 1 to 9 of 9
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Hong Kong
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 2,333
    #1

    First without second, third, etc

    First, you may say either

    Paul passed away yesterday. OR
    Paul died yesterday.

    Can I use 'First' and in the rest of the passage, I do not use 'Second' or 'Third', etc.

    Thanks.

  1. 5jj's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic

    • Join Date: Oct 2010
    • Posts: 28,134
    #2

    Re: First without second, third, etc

    Not normally.

    Can you give us a bit more of the passage?

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Hong Kong
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 2,333
    #3

    Re: First without second, third, etc

    Quote Originally Posted by fivejedjon View Post
    Not normally.

    Can you give us a bit more of the passage?
    Thanks, Fivejedjon.

    What I have written is my own creation. Just wonder if I continue writing the passage, I need to use 'Second' or 'Secondly', etc.

  2. 5jj's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic

    • Join Date: Oct 2010
    • Posts: 28,134
    #4

    Re: First without second, third, etc

    We normally use 'first(ly)' only if we are going to it with 'second(ly)', or at least '(and) then'.

    In practice, in conversation, we sometimes forget that we have used 'first', and continue with no 'second'. The listener often doesn't notice.

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Hong Kong
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 2,333
    #5

    Re: First without second, third, etc

    Quote Originally Posted by fivejedjon View Post
    We normally use 'first(ly)' only if we are going to it with 'second(ly)', or at least '(and) then'.

    In practice, in conversation, we sometimes forget that we have used 'first', and continue with no 'second'. The listener often doesn't notice.
    Thanks, Fivejedjon.

    I can use "First(ly) and after writing what I have to write. I can use "Then" for the next paragraph. Is my analysis correct?

    Sorry for asking you again.

    Thanks.
    Last edited by Tan Elaine; 24-Feb-2011 at 19:44.

  3. 5jj's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic

    • Join Date: Oct 2010
    • Posts: 28,134
    #6

    Re: First without second, third, etc

    Quote Originally Posted by Tan Elaine View Post
    I can use "First(ly) and after writing what I have to write, I can use "Then" for the next paragraph. Is my analysis correct?
    You can, but in writing I would recommend 'second(ly). When they have the written word in front of them, people have the chance to look back and notice that a 'first(ly)' has not been followed up by the expected 'second(ly).

    If you begin with 'first of all', there is no problem.

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Hong Kong
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 2,333
    #7

    Re: First without second, third, etc

    Quote Originally Posted by fivejedjon View Post
    You can, but in writing I would recommend 'second(ly). When they have the written word in front of them, people have the chance to look back and notice that a 'first(ly)' has not been followed up by the expected 'second(ly).

    If you begin with 'first of all', there is no problem.
    Thanks, Fivejedjon.

    If I use 'First of all', I need not bother about 'Secondly', etc. Just to confirm that I am correct.

    Sorry again for taking up your time.

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Feb 2011
    • Posts: 434
    #8

    Re: First without second, third, etc

    Quote Originally Posted by Tan Elaine View Post
    Thanks, Fivejedjon.

    I can use "First(ly) and after writing what I have to write, I can use "Then" for the next paragraph. Is my analysis correct?

    Sorry for asking you again.

    Thanks.
    I am not a teacher, nor am I Fivejedjon.

    It is seldom good to use "first(ly)", "second(ly)", etc. There are usually more elegant and meaningful ways to move things along. When it is appropriate, you should stay with it once you've started it, calling the final one "last(ly)". As for the "-ly", it's a matter of taste, but be aware that "first", "second" and the rest are adverbs already if you want and do not need the suffix to make them so. Pick one form or the other---do not mix them in the same piece.

  4. 5jj's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic

    • Join Date: Oct 2010
    • Posts: 28,134
    #9

    Re: First without second, third, etc

    Quote Originally Posted by Tan Elaine View Post
    If I use 'First of all', I need not bother about 'Secondly', etc. Just to confirm that I am correct.
    Yes - at least that is my opinion.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •