Shall

'Shall' is mainly used in questions nowadays.


  • Total voters
    205

joséantonio

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Despite my mother tongue is not english, I choose in disagreement.
I've read statements with shall, but are strange to find.

The word shall is found in formal writing I think:roll:

People do not usually use shall in conversations, nowadays:lol:
 

Neillythere

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2008
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Thailand
As per one of my recent posts:

I've been involved in writing many major international contracts in the past and use "shall ", "will" and "may", with very specific meanings, on a very regular basis - as Jose says, these are more formal situations.

The guidelines we have used are:

"shall" indicates that the Contractor shall (i.e. must) do X.

"will" indicates what we, as the client will do (because it's what we always do in such circumstances),

"may" indicates an option where the Contractor (or we) may do A or B depending on the circumstances at the time.

PS We already know they "can", otherwise we wouldn't have awarded them the contract!

Regards
 

philadelphia

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
French
Home Country
France
Current Location
France
(1) I usually use "shall" as the future of "should". Meaning that "Shall" (present) <=> "should" (preterit)

You shall do as I tell you.
You should do as I tell you.

Shall pressurizes 'you'. That's a obligation and even a threat.
Should advises 'you'. You should do that because that's good for you.

(2) Moreover, there's naturally a difference between "Shall" and "Will".

Will is more "a will" ("a want") => I will do it... Because I want.
Shall is more a strong intention and great pressure. => I shall do it... Because of something.

Will => 'll => won't (will not)
Shall => 'll => shan't (shall not).

Shall is rarely used, and this, more and more for a long time.
 

iconoclast

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Member Type
Academic
As a middle-aged speaker of Irish/British English, I find nothing out of the ordinary with 'shall', but only in the following contexts:

(1) in offers: Shall I make you a cup of tea?
(2) in suggestions: Let's start, shall we?
(3) in suggestions-cum-invitations: Shall we dance?
(4) in contract speak, as Neillythere points out, with a technical meaning
(5) very very rarely, stressed in strongly-felt obligation: You/He SHALL do it!
 

poorboy_9

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
China
I was "schooled" as such:
The weatherman says "it will rain".
GOD says "it shall rain"!
......and to quote Mr. Brenner in "The King and I":
" So it is written, so it SHALL be done!"
 

poorboy_9

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
China
I was "schooled" as such:
The weatherman says "it will rain".
GOD says "it shall rain"!
......and to quote Mr. Brenner in "The King and I":
" So it is written, so it SHALL be done!"
 

Clark

Key Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Today 'shall' is mostly used as a modal verb not as a tense auxilliary.
 

Unwritten

Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Arabic
Home Country
Palestinian Territory
Current Location
Palestinian Territory
<
<


hi Guys ,

I have read your comments.

for me, I haven`t think about the use of "shall" before, but from my knowledge and reading I think it is more formal althought it is still used nowadays by some person!

I just hear it in the 18th century movies :lol:

So please I need to know is it preferable to use it or not?


 

SUDHKAMP

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Location
India
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Kannada
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
I think all right minded person with good education and sophasticated grooming, do use shall. It is only those who are not cultured enough and are less educated and come from less educated background detest the use of 'shall' and term it pompous and call using those person using it as "hmmmm what they are, some Royalty".

The teachers of English have got to improve their students by giving special attention about the usage of shall and should and also elaborate the difference between shall and should, and will and would. Atleast in India, teachers are good enough to do this and I am very very thankful to the right-thinking attitude of Indian teachers teaching English. I hope other parts of the world would follow the ideal example of Indian teachers. The Indian English writers are winning Booker prizes and it goes on to show the high standards of English prevelant in India.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
I think all right minded person with good education and sophasticated grooming, do use shall. It is only those who are not cultured enough and are less educated and come from less educated background detest the use of 'shall' and term it pompous and call using those person using it as "hmmmm what they are, some Royalty".

The teachers of English have got to improve their students by giving special attention about the usage of shall and should and also elaborate the difference between shall and should, and will and would. Atleast in India, teachers are good enough to do this and I am very very thankful to the right-thinking attitude of Indian teachers teaching English. I hope other parts of the world would follow the ideal example of Indian teachers. The Indian English writers are winning Booker prizes and it goes on to show the high standards of English prevelant in India.
Yes SUDH, some very good novels have come out of India, and many Indians have impeccable English.
However, I wouldn't divide the English-speaking world into the right-minded and educated who use "shall" and the ignorami who hate and despise it. The vast majority of people who don't use "shall" have no feelings for it one way or the other - it's just not in their dialect. I don't think this makes them necessarily wrong-minded. There is no Commandment from on High saying "Thou shalt use Shall".
 

SUDHKAMP

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Location
India
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Kannada
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Yes SUDH, some very good novels have come out of India, and many Indians have impeccable English.
However, I wouldn't divide the English-speaking world into the right-minded and educated who use "shall" and the ignorami who hate and despise it. The vast majority of people who don't use "shall" have no feelings for it one way or the other - it's just not in their dialect. I don't think this makes them necessarily wrong-minded. There is no Commandment from on High saying "Thou shalt use Shall".
I do agree with you on the point, but the matter is, why these 'natives' do not know the proper usage of English. It is just because their teachers have not taught them properly. I am commenting more on the system than the people. Perhaps these 'natives' are lagging behind in learning English because they are not having good 'native teachers' back home.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
I do agree with you on the point, but the matter is, why these 'natives' do not know the proper usage of English. It is just because their teachers have not taught them properly. I am commenting more on the system than the people. Perhaps these 'natives' are lagging behind in learning English because they are not having good 'native teachers' back home.
By "natives", I take it you mean the British or the English. You have to remember also that there are many strange dialects, accents, even syntactical variants that the less educated country people in England speak. This would have some effect on the linguistic competence of the entire population as a whole, whereas in places such as India and Australia, one standard variety of English was taught, and there was no linguistic interference from country yokels.
 

SUDHKAMP

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Location
India
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Kannada
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
By "natives", I take it you mean the British or the English. You have to remember also that there are many strange dialects, accents, even syntactical variants that the less educated country people in England speak. This would have some effect on the linguistic competence of the entire population as a whole, whereas in places such as India and Australia, one standard variety of English was taught, and there was no linguistic interference from country yokels.
Is that why the standard of English is very very high in India and Australia compared to the 'natives'. Also, my friends who have settled abroad and even those 'natives' I have come across, are mostly waiters in restaurant, taxi-drivers, wage workers etc., I mean to say you cannot expect a high standard English from such people. Whereas in India all those who know English have Medical Degrees(Doctors), Engineers, Lawyers, IT professionals, MBAs, Bank Employees, Insurance agents and officers etc. And they have a very conducive atmosphere to speak a real good standard English. That is why when you use "shall" in India, there are no illiterate or semi-literate to laugh upon the usage of such words. It is not a pompous usage in India. Perhaps other countries including "natives" have got to improve their standard of English. It is only through economic success that you can improve the standard of living, thinking, education and speech.
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
I still use 'shall' otherwise than in questions. I have voted to say that it is mostly used only in questions, which I believe to be the case.
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland

SUDHKAMP

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Location
India
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Kannada
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Yes, you are almost right, it's 'shan't'.
Bhaisahab, can you please give the reason for such usages like "shan't" and are not being pronounced "i'nt"(are'nt)!
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
To the best of my knowledge aren't is pronounced 'are'nt' by some speakers (myself included) and 'arnt' by others. I honestly don't know why.;-)
 

soutter

Junior Member
Joined
May 13, 2009
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
China
I shall not tolerate anyone telling me that shall can only be used in stative or interrogative sentences.
Shall I say that again (over to you T S Eliot!)?
 
Top