Fall to vs. fall on

Status
Not open for further replies.

Allen165

Key Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Switzerland
Is there any difference in meaning between the expressions "to fall on someone" and "to fall to someone"? They seem to have the same meaning, namely, that something is someone's responsibility. There may be a difference in usage, though.

"It falls to the Court to verify whether the Member State concerned has adopted appropriate measures for ensuring the free movement of goods."

Would it be wrong to replace "falls to" with "falls on"? I don't think so. What do you think?

Thanks!
 

billmcd

Key Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Is there any difference in meaning between the expressions "to fall on someone" and "to fall to someone"? They seem to have the same meaning, namely, that something is someone's responsibility. There may be a difference in usage, though.

"It falls to the Court to verify whether the Member State concerned has adopted appropriate measures for ensuring the free movement of goods."

Would it be wrong to replace "falls to" with "falls on"? I don't think so. What do you think?

Thanks!

I would infer no difference.
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
To fall on someone can mean to attack someone (although this is becoming obsolete if it hasn't become so already), and to fall to someone can mean to be conquered by someone.

But I agree with the meaning you ascribed to the phrase in your example. It falls to the court means it is the task of the court. I think it would sound less natural to replace it with it falls on the court.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top