[Grammar] News article

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kengo

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
Hello people,

I was reading an article on Barack Obama's passive attitude towards gun control. I understand the gist of the artcle but there was one sentense that didn't grammatically make sense to me.

Two years of silence suggest Obama feels hemmed in by the zeal of the gun lobby, whose aversion to any Second Amendment limitations are widely thought to have backfired on Bill Clinton and Al Gore.

In the second half, I believe "whose aversion" is the subjest and "are" the verb of the sentense but it appears to me that the verb should be "is" because the subject is singular.
Or is there anything I'm missing...??

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:

charliedeut

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Spanish
Home Country
Spain
Current Location
Spain
Hello people,

I was reading an article on Barack Obama's passive attitude towards gun control. I understand the gist of the artcle but there was one sentense that didn't grammatically make sense to me.

Two years of silence suggest Obama feels hemmed in by the zeal of the gun lobby, whose aversion to any Second Amendment limitations are widely thought to have backfired on Bill Clinton and Al Gore.

In the second half, I believe "whose aversion" is the subjest and "are" the verb of the sentense but it appears to me that the verb should be "is" because the subject is singular.
Or is there anything I'm missing...??

Any help would be appriciated.

Hi there,

You didn't miss anything. The journalist made a "slip of the tongue" under the influence of "limitations" and wrote, therefore, a plural verb.

Greetings,

Charliedeut
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
"The gun lobby (a group of people who like guns) are..."
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Hello people,

I was reading an article on Barack Obama's passive attitude towards gun control. I understand the gist of the artcle but there was one sentense that didn't grammatically make sense to me.

Two years of silence suggest Obama feels hemmed in by the zeal of the gun lobby, whose aversion to any Second Amendment limitations are widely thought to have backfired on Bill Clinton and Al Gore.

In the second half, I believe "whose aversion" is the subjest and "are" the verb of the sentense but it appears to me that the verb should be "is" because the subject is singular.
Or is there anything I'm missing...??

Any help would be appreciated.


***** NOT A TEACHER *****


(1) I agree that "whose aversion" is the subject and the correct verb is

"is."

(2) Most Americans seem to treat "gun lobby" as a singular collective

noun: The gun lobby is very powerful.
 

riquecohen

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
Brazil
I agree with The Parser's response. I imagine that this is not a quote from a US newspaper.
 

Kengo

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
Thank you all for your responses.
I'm glad that everyone agrees that the verb should be "is" rather than "are".

However I asked my American friend this question yesterday and he said:
Look at the phrase "aversion to any Second Amendment limitationS". That's plural. It is implying that there was more than one proposed limitation, each had one or more aversions.

I did not find this quite convingcing but maybe there's some connotation that only native speakers can grasp..??
It would be great to hear more advice and opinions.
 

charliedeut

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Spanish
Home Country
Spain
Current Location
Spain
Thank you all for your responses.
I'm glad that everyone agrees that the verb should be "is" rather than "are".

However I asked my American friend this question yesterday and he said:
Look at the phrase "aversion to any Second Amendment limitationS". That's plural. It is implying that there was more than one proposed limitation, each had one or more aversions.

I did not find this quite convingcing but maybe there's some connotation that only native speakers can grasp..??
It would be great to hear more advice and opinions.

Hi there,

IMO, as already said, "are" would only be acceptable if the article said something like "gun lobby, whose complaintS against any Second Amendment limitations..." Only then would a plural verb make sense.

Greetings,

Charliedeut
 
Last edited:

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
There appears to be some sllight confusion here, though the right answer is there.

You were right in your original post - I believe "whose aversion" is the subject and "are" the verb of the sentence but it appears to me that the verb should be "is" because the subject is singular", as charliedeut confirmed in post #2, parser in post #4 and riquecohen in post #5. Your friend (post #6) made the same mistake as the writer of the original writer.
 

SoothingDave

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
It is implying that there was more than one proposed limitation, each had one or more aversions.

The "aversion" is in general and not a reaction to any particular proposed limitation. There is a never-ending series of proposed limitations.

"Aversion" makes it sound like some sort of emotional reaction, when the political opposition to gun control is based on a principle.
 

Kengo

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
There appears to be some sllight confusion here, though the right answer is there.

You were right in your original post - I believe "whose aversion" is the subject and "are" the verb of the sentence but it appears to me that the verb should be "is" because the subject is singular", as charliedeut confirmed in post #2, parser in post #4 and riquecohen in post #5. Your friend (post #6) made the same mistake as the writer of the original writer.

fivejedjon and everyone who's backed my view, thanks for your support.

It really is a complicated piece of writing that even native speakers stumble over.
I'm glad I was barely on the right track.

Thank you all again
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top