the injured man died/had died.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tan Elaine

Key Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Hong Kong
Current Location
Hong Kong
Before the ambulance arrived, the injured man died/had died.

I think both verbs can be used. Am I correct?

Thanks.
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
They can, but I vote for simple past.

With the use of "before" there is no doubt what happened in what order.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Before the ambulance arrived, the injured man died/had died.

I think both verbs can be used. Am I correct?

Thanks.
"Had died" is possible if the context calls for it. There's nothing in this sentence that suggests a need for it.

However:
"As the ambulance approached the scene, the driver noticed that no one at all was attending to the injured man. This was because, before the ambulance arrived, the injured man had died."
"No one was looking after the injured man, because he had died."
 

Fishman

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Hong Kong
Current Location
Canada
Before the ambulance arrived, the injured man died/had died.

I think both verbs can be used. Am I correct?

Thanks.

I vote for "had died", because in Hong Kong if you use just "died" and you say you're really good at American English, the teacher will just put in "had" before died anyway.
 

Tan Elaine

Key Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Hong Kong
Current Location
Hong Kong
I vote for "had died", because in Hong Kong if you use just "died" and you say you're really good at American English, the teacher will just put in "had" before died anyway.
I believe many non-native English teachers will put in 'had' before 'died', but I don't know the reason for that.
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Because the sequence is clear without it.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
I believe many non-native English teachers will put in 'had' before 'died', but I don't know the reason for that.
The reason is that many non-native teachers are taught, and teach, that two events happening at different times in the past require the earlier event to be phrased in the past perfect. It may even be normal in Hong Kong English. But it's not a rule for English elsewhere.
Examples like this are always going to occur where teachers who don't know the language teach the language - and there's no easy solution to that. No doubt, that's part of the reason for regional variation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top