"are" or "is"?

Status
Not open for further replies.

joeoct

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
There's calls either for his assassination or the assassination of his staff.

Why isn't "are" used here instead of "is"?

Thanks
 

riquecohen

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
Brazil
There's calls either for his assassination or the assassination of his staff.

Why isn't "are" used here instead of "is"?

Thanks
The writer has made a mistake. "Are" is correct.
 

Hedwig

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2011
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Spanish
Home Country
Argentina
Current Location
Argentina
The writer has made a mistake. "Are" is correct.
It seems to be a very popular mistake. I hear there's followed by plural phrases a lot on television.
 

allenman

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
It seems to be a very popular mistake. I hear there's followed by plural phrases a lot on television.
Hmmm...here in the US I can not recall this be the case on TV. I wonder if it's from non-natives?

Not a teacher -- AmE native
 

joeoct

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
Thanks for the replies. I heard it on TV.
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Natives DO say the contracted "There's" all the time, before single and plural.

What we would not say is the uncontracted "there is" -- provided, of course, our speech was formed enough in out heads that we had a good sense of the rest of the sentence we were about to say.

Spontaneous speech is filled with ungrammatical utterances because the direction of what we are going to say can change a lot from beginning to end. I hardly think this is limited to English.
 

Hedwig

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2011
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Spanish
Home Country
Argentina
Current Location
Argentina
Natives DO say the contracted "There's" all the time, before single and plural.

What we would not say is the uncontracted "there is" -- provided, of course, our speech was formed enough in out heads that we had a good sense of the rest of the sentence we were about to say.

Spontaneous speech is filled with ungrammatical utterances because the direction of what we are going to say can change a lot from beginning to end. I hardly think this is limited to English.

I agree. This is what I always thought when I heard it. And it's nto limited to English, as you say. It does happen in Spanish all the time, too.
 

joeoct

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
Thanks Barb. Then, is it better to use "There's + plural noun" or "There are/'re + plural noun" in formal writing?
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
In formal writing, absolutely use the uncontracted "There are."
 

joeoct

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
OK, thank you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top