Does "democratic" mean "fair"?

Status
Not open for further replies.

optimistic pessimist

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Member Type
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
Dear all,

I'd like to ask a native speaker of English.

1. Grouping students according to their ability isn't democratic.

2. Grouping students according to their ability would be against the principle of democracy.

In each sentence the writer, who isn't probably a native English speaker, seems to mean fair and fairness respectively by democratic and democracy.

Do you use these words just to mean fair and fairness? Do they have such broad meanings that they are used for things unrelated to political equality?

Thank you!

OP
 
Last edited:

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Dear all,

I'd like to ask a native speaker of English.

1. Grouping students according to their ability isn't democratic.

2. Grouping students according to their ability would be against the principle of democracy.

In each sentence the writer, who isn't probably a native English speaker, seems to mean fair and fairness respectively by democratic and democracy.

Do you use these words just to mean fair and fairness? Do they have such broader meanings that they are used for things unrelatied to political equality?

Thank you!

OP

I think you might be right and the speaker meant "fair" or something similar. I'm not sure how grouping students in any way could be seen to be democratic unless the students themselves voted to say which group they would like to be in.

Personally, I would have thought that grouping students based on ability seems very sensible!

In answer to your title question, I live in the UK which is allegedly a democracy. I can assure you that "democratic" doesn't necessarily mean "fair"!
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
It's a top-down decision and the students are excluded from participation in the process, which is why it's not democratic IMO.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
It's a top-down decision and the students are excluded from participation in the process, which is why it's not democratic IMO.

Oh, absolutely, I agree. I was just wondering what method of grouping students would be considered democratic (other than letting them have a say). I would expect any commonly used method would be fairly undemocratic. I certainly had no say all through school and college as to which group or class I was put in.
 

optimistic pessimist

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Member Type
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
Hi emsr2d2, Tdol,

Thanks for your replies. I'd like make sure if I'm on the right track. Judging by your replies, it is okay to say you don't use the word democratic just to mean the opposite of discriminatory?

Thank you!

OP
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Hi emsr2d2, Tdol,

Thanks for your replies. I'd like make sure if I'm on the right track. Judging by your replies, it is okay to say you don't use the word democratic just to mean the opposite of discriminatory?

Thank you!

OP

You would certainly be correct about that. The opposite of discrimanatory is non-discriminatory.
The opposite of democratic is undemocratic.
 

SoothingDave

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
The author is confusing democracy with egalitarianism.
 

optimistic pessimist

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Member Type
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
The author is confusing democracy with egalitarianism.

Hi Soothing Dave,
Thanks for your reply. Yes, I confused democracy with egalitarianism. And that's because in my native language, Japanese, "democracy/ democratic" could be used in a broader sense beyond the political principle.
For example, some people use the translation of "democratic" just to mean "fair". (Strictly speaking, it may be wrong, but that's the way we do.)

So, maybe the person who wrote sentence #2 simply tried to mean "Grouping ....against the principle of egalitariasm".

#2. Grouping students according to their ability would be against the principle of democracy.

That perfectly makes sense to me.

Thank you for clarifying that!

OP
 
Last edited:

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
For example, some people use the translation of "democratic" just to mean "fair". (Strictly speaking, it may be wrong, but that's the way we do.)
Then those who do so are misunderstanding the word, and hence mistranslating it. It's not being strict at all to explain that 'democratic' does not mean 'fair'.
 

SoothingDave

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Grass again?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top