Why 'will' in first paragraph, but 'would' in second?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tan Elaine

Key Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Hong Kong
Current Location
Hong Kong
The Victorian authorities have already toughened laws regarding certain dog breeds and any American pitbull terrier not registered by its owner by the end of this month will be destroyed.

While the new laws apply only in Victoria, national Attorney-General Robert has indicated that he would apply similar legislation across the country.

Why is 'will' used in the first paragraph, while 'would' is used instead of 'will'. I think 'will' is the correct verb. Am I correct?

Thanks.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
The Victorian authorities have already toughened laws regarding certain dog breeds and any American pitbull terrier not registered by its owner by the end of this month will be destroyed.

While the new laws apply only in Victoria, national Attorney-General Robert has indicated that he would apply similar legislation across the country.

Why is 'will' used in the first paragraph, while 'would' is used instead of 'will'. I think 'will' is the correct verb. Am I correct?

Thanks.

I can only assume that it's a certainty that those new rules will apply in the state of Victoria at this time. However, the Attorney General has said that he would [like to?] apply the same rules across the whole country. Perhaps it is not absolutely certain yet that the same rules will apply in every state.
 

riquecohen

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
Brazil
The Victorian authorities have already toughened laws regarding certain dog breeds and any American pitbull terrier not registered by its owner by the end of this month will be destroyed.

While the new laws apply only in Victoria, national Attorney-General Robert has indicated that he would apply similar legislation across the country.

Why is 'will' used in the first paragraph, while 'would' is used instead of 'will'. I think 'will' is the correct verb. Am I correct?

Thanks.
The first sentence speaks of a situation that has definitely been decided. The second sentence seems to indicate that this action is a proposal and is, therefore, less definite.
 

BobK

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Location
Spencers Wood, near Reading, UK
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
I can only assume that it's a certainty that those new rules will apply in the state of Victoria at this time. However, the Attorney General has said that he would [like to?] apply the same rules across the whole country. Perhaps it is not absolutely certain yet that the same rules will apply in every state.

:up: I think this is generally right as far as the effective meaning is concerned, but that the implied words are not 'like to' (which trades on an old understanding of 'would' as meaning 'was inclined/minded to') but another clause: 'the Attorney General has said that he would apply the same rules across the whole country [if the various political procedures allowed it].

But Australian English is both very innovative and at the same time conservative, so the less wordy implication may be right! ;-)

b
 

akhtar sharifi

New member
Joined
Sep 10, 2011
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Afghanistan
Current Location
Australia
hello,
actually will shows more probablity and would shows lesser probablities.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
To me, the "would" in the second sentence is simply backshifting of reported speech.
"I will apply this to other states, " he said. -> "He said he would apply it to other states."
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
hello,
actually will shows more probablity and would shows lesser probablities.

I don't think it does in this example. I agree with Raymott that it's backshifting- the probability is the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top