nyota
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2009
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- Polish
- Home Country
- Poland
- Current Location
- Australia
In English Grammar in Use (There and it - Murphy - Google books) Murphy states that we use it to talk about distance, time and weather e.g.
We also use it in reference to a particular place, fact, situation etc., and there when we talk about something for the first time, to say that it exists.
Now - I've got two examples that I don't think fall so clearly into only one of these categories i.e.
1) I couldn't see anything. It was completely dark.
How to explain the use of 'it' within given guidelines here? It doesn't really refer to anything in particular, perhaps the situation on the whole. But then in the following example - The journey took a long time. There was a lot of traffic. we also refer to the whole situation and yet we use 'there'. It's like the fact we're also giving new information is more important here.
The second example:
2) I wanted to visit the museum but there wasn't enough time.
Here, we're talking about time (which suggests the use of 'it') but we also give new information which calls for 'there', which is actually the right choice.
Is it so that in the two examples (which are by the way taken from the same chapter from the exercises section) are just a bit more ambiguous and they don't comply so clearly with the rules given and so, I should assume that some of the it-there choices have to be learnt as fixed phrases? Example marked with *** seems to confirm that. What do you think?
It's a long way from here to the airport.
It's a long time since I last saw you.
It was windy (but 'There was a cold wind')***
We also use it in reference to a particular place, fact, situation etc., and there when we talk about something for the first time, to say that it exists.
Now - I've got two examples that I don't think fall so clearly into only one of these categories i.e.
1) I couldn't see anything. It was completely dark.
How to explain the use of 'it' within given guidelines here? It doesn't really refer to anything in particular, perhaps the situation on the whole. But then in the following example - The journey took a long time. There was a lot of traffic. we also refer to the whole situation and yet we use 'there'. It's like the fact we're also giving new information is more important here.
The second example:
2) I wanted to visit the museum but there wasn't enough time.
Here, we're talking about time (which suggests the use of 'it') but we also give new information which calls for 'there', which is actually the right choice.
Is it so that in the two examples (which are by the way taken from the same chapter from the exercises section) are just a bit more ambiguous and they don't comply so clearly with the rules given and so, I should assume that some of the it-there choices have to be learnt as fixed phrases? Example marked with *** seems to confirm that. What do you think?
Last edited: