Early and earlier

Status
Not open for further replies.

david11

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Tamil
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Hello teachers,


1)Please get started early next time.


2)Please get started earlier next time.


Are the above two sentences correct and same?
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Hello teachers,


1)Please get started early next time.


2)Please get started earlier next time.


Are the above two sentences correct and same?
No, they aren't the same. 'Early' is a simple adverb. "Earlier" is a comparative. Their meanings can be found in any dictionary.
The sentences are both grammatically correct, and they both have possible meanings. Would you like to try to work out the difference?
 
Last edited:

billmcd

Key Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Hello teachers,


1)Please get started early next time.


2)Please get started earlier next time.


Are the above two sentences correct and same?

#1 is a broad or general reference for starting and suggests that the person(s) was (were) late. #2 requests that the person(s) start earlier than the previous time, but was (were) not necessarily late.
 

david11

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Tamil
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
#1 is a broad or general reference for starting and suggests that the person(s) was (were) late. #2 requests that the person(s) start earlier than the previous time, but was (were) not necessarily late.

1)Please get started early next time.

The person started late than he should have.


2)Please get started earlier next time.

The person may not have started late but it would be fine if he starts little soon.


Is it correct? sir.
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
1)Please get started early next time.

The person started later than he should have.


2)Please get started earlier next time.

The person may not have started late but it would be fine if he starts little soon.


Is it correct? sir.
No, it's not, it's the reverse.
 

billmcd

Key Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
1)Please get started early next time.

The person started later than he should have.


2)Please get started earlier next time.

The person may not have started late but it would be [STRIKE]fine[/STRIKE]better if he starts a little sooner.


Is it correct? sir.

See bhaisahab's response.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Sorry, what I wrote before was wrong. Both 'early' and 'earlier' are acting as adverbs here - though they can both be adjectives as well. I've corrected my original post.

Here, "Early" is simply an adverb of time. "Start early"
"Earlier" is a comparative. It relates to another time - probably the last time he started.
They would both be adjectives in: "Please start at an early time" and "Please start at an earlier time".
Whether they are used adjectivally or adverbially, the point is that "start early" simply means give yourself enough time, while "start earlier" means give yourself more time than you did last time.
 

david11

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Tamil
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Thank you for your replies.



Bhaisahab post seems to be contradicting post 3#.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Thank you for your replies.


Bhaisahab post seems to be contradicting post 3#.
Yes, it does seem to be. I agree with bhai. But they are both just guesses about the most likely context. Both sentences could be used in the same context.
The main difference is that one is an ordinary modifying word - "early" - (whether it modifies the noun or the verb) and the other is a comparative. That's what you need to understand. Sometimes the difference is more obvious.

Jack says to Peter:
-1) "You need to be strong if you want to build the house yourself."
Well, Peter might be strong, so 1. doesn't mean that Jack thinks Peter can't build the house.
- 2) "You need to be stronger if you want to build the house yourself."
2 does mean that Jack thinks Peter can't build the house because he is not strong enough.
 
Last edited:

david11

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Tamil
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Yes, it does seem to be. I agree with bhai. But they are both just guesses about the most likely context. Both sentences could be used in the same context.
The main difference is that one is an ordinary modifying word - "early" - (whether it modifies the noun or the verb) and the other is a comparative. That's what you need to understand. Sometimes the difference is more obvious.

Jack says to Peter:
-1) "You need to be strong if you want to build the house yourself."
Well, Peter might be strong, so 1. doesn't mean that Jack thinks Peter can't build the house.
- 2) "You need to be stronger if you want to build the house yourself."
2 does mean that Jack thinks Peter can't build the house because he is not strong enough.

Well explained sir.


Thanks to all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top