Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. Member
    Student or Learner
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • Canada

    • Join Date: Dec 2008
    • Posts: 177
    #1

    Relative Clause Omission Rule

    Example sentences:

    A lawyer is a person who works in the justice system and [who] represents people in court.

    A lawyer is a person who works in the justice system and [who] does not have the power to sentence offenders.

    A concubine is a woman who is a mistress and [who] does not have the same status as the official wife.

    *Note: Please ignore the content of the sentences (I hastily put them together.).

    Questions:

    Is the "who" in red necessary? I see that sometimes "who" is repeated and sometimes not.

    When would you say that I need to put it? I am assuming that it is a matter of clarity. Is it better to have it than not?

    Thanks in advance.
    Last edited by vcolts; 11-Dec-2011 at 06:24.

  2. JohnParis's Avatar
    Senior Member
    Retired Academic
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • France

    • Join Date: Oct 2011
    • Posts: 773
    #2

    Re: Relative Clause Omission Rule

    [who] is not necessary in any of your sentences. They are quite clear without [who].

  3. Member
    Student or Learner
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • Canada

    • Join Date: Dec 2008
    • Posts: 177
    #3

    Re: Relative Clause Omission Rule

    I am kinda wondering about that as well.

    Is the "who" necessary for the third sentence because the form of the verb in use is different?

  4. JohnParis's Avatar
    Senior Member
    Retired Academic
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • France

    • Join Date: Oct 2011
    • Posts: 773
    #4

    Re: Relative Clause Omission Rule

    In my opinion, I still believe that the second who in the third sentence is superfluous and stilted.
    What are your comments on:
    A concubine is a woman who is a mistress who does not have the same status as the official wife.

Similar Threads

  1. [Grammar] omission rule
    By vcolts in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 13-Dec-2011, 16:08
  2. [Grammar] Omission/Reduction Rule
    By vcolts in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 18-Nov-2011, 17:34
  3. [Grammar] Omission Rule?
    By vcolts in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 25-Oct-2011, 23:20
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 27-Apr-2010, 14:13
  5. Exception to the rule? Omission of relative pronoun
    By Federerexpress in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 23-Jan-2010, 14:57

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •