keannu
VIP Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2010
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Korean
- Home Country
- South Korea
- Current Location
- South Korea
This is a question related to a relative adverb, and the answer goes like this. But does a comma have to be inserted between "2000' and "when"? The explanation for the answer is that 2000 is already known information and when-clause is addtional information for it.
But why can the original sentence be as it is? In the original sentence, when-clause can work as a describing part for 2000, can't it?
Q.Correct a wrong part.
ex)He was 24 in 2000 when I was only five years old. (no comma)
=> He was 24 in 2000, when I was only five years old. (comma)
gz2-46
But why can the original sentence be as it is? In the original sentence, when-clause can work as a describing part for 2000, can't it?
Q.Correct a wrong part.
ex)He was 24 in 2000 when I was only five years old. (no comma)
=> He was 24 in 2000, when I was only five years old. (comma)
gz2-46