[General] clause, group and words

Status
Not open for further replies.

lolliswan

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Malay
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Malaysia
Hi All,

I have difficulty understanding the meaning of clause, group, content words and grammatical words. I appreciate your help to explain them to me, based on the example below:

The policeman, who had never heard of the Lawrence Amendment, was stumped by the supercilious approach of the barrister.

Is it correct to categorise them as follows:

Clause - The policeman
was stumped by the supercilious approach of the barrister
who had never heard of the Lawrence Amendment

Groups - The policeman, the Lawrence Amendment, the barrister

Content words - heard, stumped, approach,

Grammatical words - had never, supercilious



Your advice and feedback is highly appreciated. Thank you
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Welcome to Using English, lolliswan.

I'm afraid the terms you're using (group, content words, and grammatical words) are not familiar to me in this context.

Can you explain what you're looking for when you want to identify the "groups," for example? Or what a "content word" is supposed to be?
 

lolliswan

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Malay
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Malaysia
Welcome to Using English, lolliswan.

I'm afraid the terms you're using (group, content words, and grammatical words) are not familiar to me in this context.

Can you explain what you're looking for when you want to identify the "groups," for example? Or what a "content word" is supposed to be?


Are there any teachers out there who could help me, please?
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
The policeman, who had never heard of the Lawrence Amendment, was stumped by the supercilious approach of the barrister.

I have underlined the grammatical/function words. The others are content/lexical words.

Clause - The policeman was stumped by the supercilious approach of the barrister
who had never heard of the Lawrence Amendment
 
Last edited:

lolliswan

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Malay
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Malaysia
Hi 5jj,

Thank you for your response. After some thorough reading on the definitions and reference to your reply, I finally understood what they are now.

Thank you once again.
 

lolliswan

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Malay
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Malaysia
Hi 5jj,

Just a question; am I right to say the auxiliary verb 'was' should be classified under grammatical/ function word?

Thanks
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
Just a question; am I right to say the auxiliary verb 'was' should be classified under grammatical/ function word?
You are. Sorry, I missed that one. I have now edited my post.
 

lolliswan

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Malay
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Malaysia
ok, thanks alot, 5jj
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top