jiangyueming
Junior Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Chinese
- Home Country
- China
- Current Location
- China
Would you mind helping me correct this essey? Thank you. I am sorry if I occupy your precious time.
Do you agree or disagree:
It's more important for the government to build art museums and music performance center than to build recreational devices (such as swimming pool, playgrounds).
With the improvement of living standard of modern people, leisure activities are gaining more popularity, such as go to the art museums, go the concerts, or go to the swimming pools. However, as whether it's more important for the government to build art museums and music performance center than to build recreational devices. The answers vary. But for me, building more recreational facilities is more favorable.
Compared with the art museums and music performance center, recreational facilities can benefit more people. Modern people, especially young people, are undergoing many pressures, they need to find a place to escape the pressures. Recreational places serve this purpose. Since they can go to
recreational places to relax themselves. Admittedly, some people prefer to go the concerts or the art museums to appreciate art. But it just suit a small mount of people. For those who don't like art at all, they are unwilling to go the concerts or museums. On the other hand, all people need to do exercises everyday. They may play football or go to swim with their friends. So if the government gives more subsidies on building more recreational facilities, all the citizen will be beneficial. What's more, it also can increase communication between friends.
Art museums and music performance center require no more money than recreational facilities. There is no doubt that building a museum needs a lot of investment. The art works exhibited in the museums that were bought from artists and the facilities in the concerts such as sounder with high quality cost substantial money. However, it doesn't mean that recreational facilities deserve less subsidies. Take building a swimming pool for example. First the government has to buy a large estate and equip it with advance facilities. And then the swimming pool needs several guards for the sake of saving people who may drown. What's more, training these guards is also not a small sum of expense. So building recreational facilities needs more money from the government.
All in all, since building recreational facilities can benefit more ranges of people and need more money. I reckon that it's more important for the government to build recreational devices than to build art museums and music performance center.
Do you agree or disagree:
It's more important for the government to build art museums and music performance center than to build recreational devices (such as swimming pool, playgrounds).
With the improvement of living standard of modern people, leisure activities are gaining more popularity, such as go to the art museums, go the concerts, or go to the swimming pools. However, as whether it's more important for the government to build art museums and music performance center than to build recreational devices. The answers vary. But for me, building more recreational facilities is more favorable.
Compared with the art museums and music performance center, recreational facilities can benefit more people. Modern people, especially young people, are undergoing many pressures, they need to find a place to escape the pressures. Recreational places serve this purpose. Since they can go to
recreational places to relax themselves. Admittedly, some people prefer to go the concerts or the art museums to appreciate art. But it just suit a small mount of people. For those who don't like art at all, they are unwilling to go the concerts or museums. On the other hand, all people need to do exercises everyday. They may play football or go to swim with their friends. So if the government gives more subsidies on building more recreational facilities, all the citizen will be beneficial. What's more, it also can increase communication between friends.
Art museums and music performance center require no more money than recreational facilities. There is no doubt that building a museum needs a lot of investment. The art works exhibited in the museums that were bought from artists and the facilities in the concerts such as sounder with high quality cost substantial money. However, it doesn't mean that recreational facilities deserve less subsidies. Take building a swimming pool for example. First the government has to buy a large estate and equip it with advance facilities. And then the swimming pool needs several guards for the sake of saving people who may drown. What's more, training these guards is also not a small sum of expense. So building recreational facilities needs more money from the government.
All in all, since building recreational facilities can benefit more ranges of people and need more money. I reckon that it's more important for the government to build recreational devices than to build art museums and music performance center.
