shabani
Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2009
- Member Type
- Other
- Native Language
- Persian
- Home Country
- Iran
- Current Location
- Iran
Hello everyone,
I'm confused by this phrase. Can anyone please tell me why the writer didn't use"having to fund" in the following sentence?
It is then protected against competitors benefiting by imitating the new product without having had to fund its development.
It would make sense to me if it was past tense
I'm confused by this phrase. Can anyone please tell me why the writer didn't use"having to fund" in the following sentence?
It is then protected against competitors benefiting by imitating the new product without having had to fund its development.
It would make sense to me if it was past tense