Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. kity2498

    Thumbs down 2nd conditional or passive?

    can anyone answer this for me? I had this question in a book:

    1. What would happen if the sky (was / were ) polluted?
    my answer was to choose 'were' as it being the correct choice in a contrary to fact 'if' clause.
    However i was told that the correct choice would be 'was' because it is passive.
    I am confused .... who is correct?

  2. Editor,
    English Teacher
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Laos

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 60,747

    Re: 2nd conditional or passive?

    There's no difference between active and passive IMO with the conditionals. I would say that both forms are correct, though 'were' is preferred by many. If you say 'if I were you', then say 'if the sky were polluted' as well.

Similar Threads

  1. will x 2
    By M56 in forum General Language Discussions
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 09-Aug-2005, 12:46
  2. passive or Active?
    By ESL-lover in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-Feb-2005, 03:32
  3. about passive voice
    By Anonymous in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 19-Jul-2004, 00:19
  4. passive
    By hela in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-May-2004, 11:36
  5. passives
    By Anonymous in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21-Feb-2003, 15:54


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts