fluid and ‘live

Status
Not open for further replies.

keannu

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
What do you think this "live" means? The translation is "living, alive", but I'm not sure. Clothes are alive, that sounds weird.

mo3-34
ex)Ancient Greek and Roman costume is essentially draped,and presents a traditional stability and permanence. While it
received certain fashions over the centuries, it never underwent any major transformation. Léon Heuzey, the pioneer of the study of classical costume, set forth with exemplary clarity its two basic principles: the first is that Classical costume has no form in itself, as it consisted of a simple rectangular piece of cloth woven in varying sizes according to its intended use and the height of the customer, without differentiation between the sexes; the second is that this cloth is always draped, never shaped or cut, and was worn round the body in accordance with definite rules. Thus it was always fluid and ‘live.’ It is notable that we find no evidence in Classical times of tailors or dressmakers: the word itself barely exists in Greek or Latin
 
Last edited:

SoothingDave

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I don't know. I don't speak "fashion."
 

JMurray

Key Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
English
Home Country
New Zealand
Current Location
Australia
What do you think this "live" means? The translation is "living, alive", but I'm not sure. Clothes are alive, that sounds weird.

Ancient Greek and Roman costume is essentially draped,and presents a traditional stability and permanence. While it
received certain fashions over the centuries, it never underwent any major transformation. Léon Heuzey, the pioneer of the study of classical costume, set forth with exemplary clarity its two basic principles: the first is that Classical costume has no form in itself, as it consisted of a simple rectangular piece of cloth woven in varying sizes according to its intended use and the height of the customer, without differentiation between the sexes; the second is that this cloth is always draped, never shaped or cut, and was worn round the body in accordance with definite rules. Thus it was always fluid and ‘live.’ It is notable that we find no evidence in Classical times of tailors or dressmakers: the word itself barely exists in Greek or Latin.


I feel a bit like SD, but I'll have a go.
I think it says that because the fabric in a Classical garment was not shaped or tailored to fit the body closely, it was able to respond to the body's movement in a loose and fluid way that imbued the garment with a sense of life. I notice that the writer has put 'live' in quotes, perhaps to stop short of suggesting that it was actually "living" or "alive" as per the translation. Here, "live" may be close in meaning to "animated".

not a teacher
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top