0.2 litre or 0.2 litres

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tan Elaine

Key Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Hong Kong
Current Location
Hong Kong
Using vaccuum suction technology, flushing liquids takes only 0.2 litre / litres of water while flushing solids requires only one litre.

The above sentence is from a local paper.

I remember reading that anything less than one should be followed by a plural noun, so I think '0.2 litres' should have been used instead.

Thanks.
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
I agree with you in that context.

Alternatively you could say '. . . takes only one fifth of a litre.'

Rover
 

Tan Elaine

Key Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Hong Kong
Current Location
Hong Kong
Thanks, Rover.

It just dawns on me that 0.2 litres doesn't make sense since it is less that 1 litre; 2, 3, 4, etc litres make sense.

Could you please explain the reason for the usage? Thanks.
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Whether it makes sense or not, that's the standard usage for any weight or measure.

Only a whole unit takes the singular word:

0.5 miles, 1 mile, 1.001 miles etc.

Rover
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top