Use of the word "foundation."

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ricochet

New member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Which of the following two sentences is correct...and why?

"It is important that students understand the fundamental principles of manufacturing. The objective of the course is to provide a solid foundation of the science and techniques necessary for that understanding."

or


"It is important that students understand the fundamental principles of manufacturing. The objective of the course is to provide a solid foundation in the science and techniques necessary for that understanding."
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
Which of the following two sentences is correct...and why?

"It is important that students understand the fundamental principles of manufacturing. The objective of the course is to provide a solid foundation of the science and techniques necessary for that understanding."

or


"It is important that students understand the fundamental principles of manufacturing. The objective of the course is to provide a solid foundation in the science and techniques necessary for that understanding."

The second one is correct. We generally use "in" after "foundation".
 

Ricochet

New member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
Second part of my question: "why?"
Is there an invisible 'thank you' there? Or is it just a simple demand for more free help?
 

Ricochet

New member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Is there an invisible 'thank you' there? Or is it just a simple demand for more free help?


How 'bout a "half" thank you...for answering the first half of my question. ;-)

(Seriously, I didn't mean to come across as ungrateful or demanding.)
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
(Seriously, I didn't mean to come across as ungrateful or demanding.)

Whether you meant to or not, you did. My answer is "We generally use "in" after "foundation".
 

Ricochet

New member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Whether you meant to or not, you did. My answer is "We generally use "in" after "foundation".

My apologies for failing to offer my thanks, and for appearing to be ungrateful.

My purpose in posting here was to gain an understanding regarding correct usage. Responding with "we generally use..." doesn't provide that understanding; rather, it begs the question. And if "we generally use..." is meant to imply that both "of" and "in" are correct, but that "in" is more-often preferred, then it seems to suggest that there may be particular situations in which "of" is preferred. Knowing what, if any, those situations are would provide the usage understanding I was hoping to get.

-Rick
 

HanibalII

Member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
The second one is correct. We generally use "in" after "foundation".


Hi, sorry to hijack, but could you please explain why 'in' is generally used after foundation?
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
Hi, sorry to hijack, but could you please explain why 'in' is generally used after foundation?

There is nothing grammatically wrong with "provide a foundation of" or indeed, "at", but we don't say it that way.
 

HanibalII

Member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Sorry, but that doesn't answer the question.

You made the statement that 'in' is generally used after foundation. But you didn't say why.

Your reply was there is nothing grammatically wrong with saying 'of' or 'at', just that we don't say it that way.

My question was why 'in' according to you is generally followed after 'foundation'.





Cheers

Hani
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
Sorry, but that doesn't answer the question.

You made the statement that 'in' is generally used after foundation. But you didn't say why.

Your reply was there is nothing grammatically wrong with saying 'of' or 'at', just that we don't say it that way.

My question was why 'in' according to you is generally followed after 'foundation'.





Cheers

Hani

Let me ask you a question; do you say "I came on the bus" or "I came in the bus"? Whichever preposition you use, why do you use it?
 
Last edited:

charliedeut

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Spanish
Home Country
Spain
Current Location
Spain
Hi,

Maybe they didn't explain why for one or more of the following reasons:

- There is no reason why (as it often happens with 'whys' in language)
- There is, but it is too long to explain in a post, as it involves a lengthy explanation of the etymology of "foundation" as well as its historical evolution (for instance).
- There is, but they just don't happen to know.
- They were annoyed by what they considered ungratefulness/rudeness.
- ... (you name it)

charliedeut
 

HanibalII

Member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Hi,

Maybe they didn't explain why for one or more of the following reasons:

- There is no reason why (as it often happens with 'whys' in language) If there is no reason, why state 'generally' it is used.
- There is, but it is too long to explain in a post, as it involves a lengthy explanation of the etymology of "foundation" as well as its historical evolution (for instance). Then why not provide a link/s regarding it?
- There is, but they just don't happen to know. If they don't know, then it shouldnt be stated as a 'general' rule. Nor should they be giving an answer.
- They were annoyed by what they considered ungratefulness/rudeness.No, he blew it way out. To begin with, the question was never accurately answered. What exactly was the OP suppose to thank him for? giving a very broad answer without elaborating as to why it is the answer? I thought the idea of this forum was to help people understand English. His answer gave no understanding.
- ... (you name it)

charliedeut


Those are my thoughts on this matter, and I've actually seen this as a frequent case. Some members give very succinct 'answers' without elaborating as to why it is the answer. How is that going to help posters understand?

I've seen the whole 'this is a free service' thing thrown around a lot. If answers aren't going to be given and explained why they are the answers, other than just 'We generally use....' then nobody is going to learn.

But I suppose, you get what you pay for. :-|
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
But I suppose, you get what you pay for.
Don't forget - you get the freedom to whinge away at the poor quality of the free service, and to tell people giving the free service what they should do to improve it.
 
Last edited:

HanibalII

Member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Don' forget - you get the freedom to whinge away at the poor quality of the free service, and to tell people giving the free service what they should do to improve it.


Everybody is a member of the community, does that not give everybody the right to discuss/mention certain aspects of the community.

My point is, they're doing it for free, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't still put in as much effort as they can. It may be a free service, but they choose to participate in this free service. Nobody is holding a gun to their head in order to get them to reply to questions, but if they do bother to reply, it shouldn't be half an attempt.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
Don't forget - you get the freedom to whinge away at the poor quality of the free service, and to tell people giving the free service what they should do to improve it.
However, there are limits. I am closing this thread.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
My question was why 'in' according to you is generally followed after 'foundation'.

There's no reason why we use a particular preposition much of the time. Grammatically, if a preposition is required, then there is a need for a preposition but grammar does not determine which one. We could equally say on/in 8 o'clock-there is no grammatical reason why not. We don't use these prepositions because the vast majority of people in the speech community we grow up in don't.That is a reason in itself. You may find dialects where on 8 o'clock is used. I don't say on the weekend because I did not grow up in the US.

People walk through a forest. Gradually they create paths and routes. Later, people will follow these paths. Language is much like that. A lot of things, like collocation, have no reason or logic other than the fact that everybody else says them. A white and black film sounds weird, but a black and white film sounds natural- there is no grammatical reason behind the sequence. The pattern is established through usage.

On a personal note, after your if they do bother point, I suggest you look at the number of posts some people have given, often over years, and rethink your rudeness and ingratitude. If you ever repeat stuff like this, you will be banned permanently. You're free to be rude about me- that's not a banning issue, but if you sneer again at people who are asked to answer hundreds of questions a day, then I will kick you out.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top