would probably have kissed

Status
Not open for further replies.

keannu

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
Doesn't "would probably have kissed" have to be corrected to "probably kissed"? As I learned from teachers here, for past presumption, "probably kissed" or "might(could) have kissed" works. "would have pp" is for counterfactual imaginary past result. Did the test-maker make a mistake or does it make sense?

gi24
Q. Find a proper word in the text
In Persia, a servant would probably have kissed his owner (on the cheek) to show respect.
ex)In the old days, kissing was better known as an act of respect than one of love. In Persia, a man would show his respect for another man by kissing him on the lips if they were in the same social position, or on the cheeck if they were not. The ancient Greeks and Romans also used to kiss the mouth, eyes, hand, or even the knee or foot, as a sign of respect or as a greeting.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
Doesn't "would probably have kissed" have to be corrected to "probably kissed"?
No. It's fine as it is. 'Would have kissed' is more certain than 'might have kissed'.
 

keannu

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
It shatters my belief that "would have pp" is a counterfactual statement. As you say so, it can be used either way, but I'm confused.
 

SoothingDave

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
"If they would have kissed" is a counterfactual.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
It shatters my belief that "would have pp" is a counterfactual statement. As you say so, it can be used either way, but I'm confused.
After the many threads you started on 'would', I would have thought that you would have realised by now that context is vital.

Incidentally, SD's if they would have kissed does not work in BrE; we'd say, If they had kissed ... .
 

keannu

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
I'd like to know the order of certainty centering around "would have pp". Could you check if the following order is correct? I think can/may precede could/might as past modals always represent more distant possibility than present ones.

1 kissed> will have kissed > would have kissed > must have kissed > can have kissed > could have kissed > may have kissed > might have kissed
2.probably kissed> will probably have kissed > would probably have kissed > same order...(if probably considered)

...In Persia, a servant would probably have kissed his owner (on the cheek) to show respect
 
Last edited:

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
This is a pointless question, keannu. Without context there is no meaning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top