Results 1 to 10 of 10

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Canada
      • Current Location:
      • Canada

    • Join Date: Feb 2012
    • Posts: 4
    • Post Thanks / Like

    "were found" versus Past Perfect

    Hello everyone,

    Could you help me clarify 'were found' versus the past perfect tense, please?

    From what I understand, the past perfect tense is composed of the auxiliary "had" (to have: in past simple tense, third person) and the past participle of the main verb. For example: "They had found".

    Then I see "were found" (as in 'they were found') which is the simple past tense of "to be" (third person) and "found". In this case, is 'found' the past participle? Or, is it functioning as an adjective or something?

    Can someone explain to me the difference?

    Thank you!
    Last edited by Purdy; 05-Sep-2012 at 03:36.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 21-Jun-2012, 11:33
  2. [Grammar] Is it optional to use past perfect tense after "After"
    By kwfine in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22-Jun-2011, 10:39
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28-Dec-2006, 03:24
  4. Simple past versus past perfect or pluperfect
    By chrisalor in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-Sep-2006, 20:59
  5. difference BTW "past perfect" and "sim perfect"
    By endeavor6636 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2006, 07:13

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts