It was in the zoo that/which/where I saw the acident.

Status
Not open for further replies.

wotcha

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
1. It was in the zoo that/which/where I saw in the accident.


What I'm wondering about is if we can replace 'that' in the sentence

with 'which' or 'where'.


In most English grammar books published in Korea say that

we can't put 'where' in the above sentence because the precedent is a

prepositional clause : in the zoo. That is;


2. It was in the zoo that/ which I saw the accident -> correct

3. It was in the zoo where I saw the accident -> incorrect

4. It was the zoo where I saw the accident -> correct.


The above three sentences are the way we teach students in Korea, but

some books say sentence 2 is also grammatical.


Can you please tell me whether 2,3, and 4 are grammatical or not?
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
1. It was in the zoo that/which/where I saw in the accident.


What I'm wondering about is if we can replace 'that' in the sentence

with 'which' or 'where'.


In most English grammar books published in Korea say that

we can't put 'where' in the above sentence because the precedent is a

prepositional clause : in the zoo. That is;


2. It was in the zoo that/ which I saw the accident -> correct

3. It was in the zoo where I saw the accident -> incorrect

4. It was the zoo where I saw the accident -> correct.


The above three sentences are the way we teach students in Korea, but

some books say sentence 2 is also grammatical.


Can you please tell me whether 2,3, and 4 are grammatical or not?
If you want to say that you saw the accident in the zoo, you have to use "that".

3 and 4 can be grammatical if the meaning is different.
A: In which zoo did you see the tiger?
B: It was in the zoo where I saw the accident.
B: It was in the zoo in which I saw the accident.
B: It was the zoo where I saw the accident.

But none of these mean, "It was in the zoo that I saw the accident"
 

wotcha

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
If you want to say that you saw the accident in the zoo, you have to use "that".

3 and 4 can be grammatical if the meaning is different.
A: In which zoo did you see the tiger?
B: It was in the zoo where I saw the accident.
B: It was in the zoo in which I saw the accident.
B: It was the zoo where I saw the accident.

But none of these mean, "It was in the zoo that I saw the accident"


Thank you so much!
 

wotcha

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
If you want to say that you saw the accident in the zoo, you have to use "that".

3 and 4 can be grammatical if the meaning is different.
A: In which zoo did you see the tiger?
B: It was in the zoo where I saw the accident.
B: It was in the zoo in which I saw the accident.
B: It was the zoo where I saw the accident.

But none of these mean, "It was in the zoo that I saw the accident"


Sorry but another question!

Then 'It was in the zoo which I saw the accident' is grammatical though it is different in meaning from

'It was in the zoo that I saw the accident'?
 

tzfujimino

Key Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
Sorry but another question!

Then 'It was in the zoo which I saw the accident' is grammatical though it is different in meaning from

'It was in the zoo that I saw the accident'?

Hello, wotcha.:-D
I think you'll need 'in' if you wish to use 'which' (as in Raymott's example):

"It (=The zoo in which/where I saw the tiger) was in the zoo in which I saw the accident."

"It was in the zoo which is located in the suburbs of London." is grammatical.
('which' in the sentence above has a different function in the relative clause.)

I hope you'll understand what I mean.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top