Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. wotcha's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea

    • Join Date: Jun 2010
    • Posts: 735
    #1

    He admitted killing/ having killed the frog.

    1. He admitted killing the frog.

    2. He admitted having killed the frog.


    Is there any difference between 1 and 2?


    If there isn't any why people say like 2?

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • England

    • Join Date: Jun 2010
    • Posts: 24,502
    #2

    Re: He admitted killing/ having killed the frog.

    There's no difference.

    I'd say #1 is more natural.

    Rover

  2. bhaisahab's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Ireland

    • Join Date: Apr 2008
    • Posts: 25,627
    #3

    Re: He admitted killing/ having killed the frog.

    #1 may be more natural, but #2 is perfectly correct. As for why people say it like that: why not? There are several different and equally correct ways to express it.

Similar Threads

  1. admitted/accepted to Harvard University
    By joham in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23-Oct-2011, 15:18
  2. admitted hospital
    By Ju in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-Aug-2011, 18:23
  3. [General] be admitted to the bar
    By vil in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24-Oct-2010, 16:02
  4. He admitted...
    By fire fly in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 19-May-2010, 06:12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •