[Grammar] The higher the trees is, the stronger is the wind.

Status
Not open for further replies.

wotcha

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
1. The higher the trees is, the stronger is the wind.

2. The higher the tree is, the stronger the wind is.


I found sentence 1 on the net and it is explained that

'The second clause in this sentence is inverted because of

the noun subject followed by be verb', which means there can't be

an inversion if the subject of second sentence is a pronoun.



I also found the below sentence 3 from my grammar book.


3. Younger people today see the world more clearly than do their elders.


The book says an inversion will occur if a subject of second sentence

is long. - Tough I don't know how long is long enough to invert. :roll:



Then, are 2 and 3 grammatical and do we really need to invert in those two cases?
 
Last edited:

BobK

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Location
Spencers Wood, near Reading, UK
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
1. The higher the trees [STRIKE]is[/STRIKE] are, the stronger is the wind.

2. The higher the tree is, the stronger the wind is.

'These are both OK. Inversion is not compulsory. You can also omit the verb in either case: 2. The higher the tree [is], the stronger the wind.'


I found sentence 1 on the net and it is explained that

'The second clause in this sentence is inverted because of

the noun subject followed by be verb', (interesting use of 'because'; it probably means 'The second clause in this sentence is called inverted because its subject is followed by the verb') which means there can't be an inversion if the subject of second sentence is a pronoun. (How does that mean it? It's true, but your source doesn't fill me with confidence.)



I also found the below sentence 3 from my grammar book.


3. Younger people today see the world more clearly than do their elders.


The book says [STRIKE]an[/STRIKE] inversion [STRIKE]will [/STRIKE] may occur if a subject of second sentence
I've no idea what this string of words might mean.


Is that all right?



Is that correct?
If I knew what it meant, I'd tell you. ;-)

b
 

wotcha

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
If I knew what it meant, I'd tell you. ;-)

b


I meant the subject of second clause; their elders


"Younger people today see the world more clearly than do their elders"
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
I meant the subject of second clause; their elders


"Younger people today see the world more clearly than do their elders"

If you are asking whether that sentence is correct; it is.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
1. The higher the trees is, the stronger is the wind.

The higher the tree is, the stronger the wind is.
The higher the trees are, the stronger the wind is.
The higher the tree is, the stronger the wind.
The higher the trees, the stronger the wind.

I prefer the versions without the final "is".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top