[Grammar] consisting of/consist of

Status
Not open for further replies.

anhnha

Senior Member
Joined
May 5, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Vietnamese
Home Country
Vietnam
Current Location
Vietnam
I would like to know why the wiriter use "consisting of" in the following sentence. Although I know it is correct but I feel confused.
Early in the nineteenth century, however, the Peale family of Philadelphia established the still life, a picture consisting mainly of inanimate objects, as a valuable part of the artist's repertoire.
As for me I think that "a picture" is subject, therefore I will use the verb "consist of". Can I use it?
In this sentence "consisting" is gerund and mainly is adverb, right? This make me confused about which part of sentence
the adverb refers to.
Thank for help.



 

SlickVic9000

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2011
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
(Not a Teacher)

You could say "consisting" is a participle, and the phrase immediately following a "participial phrase" describing "the picture".
If you so desire, you can replace "consisting" with "that consists of".
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
I agree with Vic.

The adverb 'mainly' modifies the phrasal verb 'consists of'.

Rover
 

anhnha

Senior Member
Joined
May 5, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Vietnamese
Home Country
Vietnam
Current Location
Vietnam
If you so desire, you can replace "consisting" with "that consists of".
Is it really necessary to use "that" in the above phrase?
Can I omit it without any difference in meaning?
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
Is it really necessary to use "that" in the above phrase?
Can I omit it without any difference in meaning?

Yes, it is necessary. No, you can't omit it.
 

anhnha

Senior Member
Joined
May 5, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Vietnamese
Home Country
Vietnam
Current Location
Vietnam
Yes, it is necessary. No, you can't omit it.
Could you tell me the reasons for it?
I don't see any problem about omitting "that" in the sentence.:-?
A picture consists of mainly of inanimate objects, as a valuable part of the artist's repertoire.
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Could you tell me the reasons for it?
I don't see any problem about omitting "that" in the sentence.:-?
A picture consists of mainly of inanimate objects, as a valuable part of the artist's repertoire.

Yes, that would be a grammatical sentence on its own. But in the original sentence, it's a noun phrase, an appositive to "still life," and so you need a noun phrase to follow it, not a new, complete sentence.
 

anhnha

Senior Member
Joined
May 5, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Vietnamese
Home Country
Vietnam
Current Location
Vietnam
Thank you!
I am a bit confused, hope anyone help me.
Can you tell me the following statement is right or wrong?
1) Is "a picture consisting mainly of inanimate objects" in the original sentence an appositive noun?
2) Is "a picture that consists mainly of inanimate objects" in the original sentence an appositive noun?
3) Is "a picture consists mainly of inanimate objects" a complete sentence and it isn't an appositive noun?

 

tzfujimino

Key Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
Thank you!
I am a bit confused, hope anyone help me.
Can you tell me the following statement is right or wrong?
1) Is "a picture consisting mainly of inanimate objects" in the original sentence an appositive noun?
2) Is "a picture that consists mainly of inanimate objects" in the original sentence an appositive noun?
Yes, these two can be appositives in your original sentence.
3) Is "a picture consists mainly of inanimate objects" a complete sentence and it isn't an appositive noun?
I agree with you.


Hello, anhnha.:-D

1. "The Peale family of Philadelphia established the still life (= a picture consisting mainly of inanimate objects) as a valuable part of the artist's repertoire."

It's not grammatical to put a full sentence "a picture consists mainly of inanimate objects." in the parentheses. 'a picture' is the subject, and 'consists' is the finite verb, and therefore it is a full/complete sentence.

It is grammatical to put a noun/noun phrase (, not a full sentence), which is in apposition to 'the still life'. (as Barb pointed out)

2. "a picture [consisting mainly of inanimate objects]"
3. "a picture [that consists mainly of inanimate objects]"

Those words in the brackets are postmodifiers. They (post)modify the noun 'a picture'.
They (2. and 3.) are not full/complete sentences, and they can function as appositives.
They fit well in the parentheses in the original sentence. (1.)

I did my best to convince you...
I hope you'll understand what I mean.:oops:
 
Last edited:

anhnha

Senior Member
Joined
May 5, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Vietnamese
Home Country
Vietnam
Current Location
Vietnam
Hello tzfujimino,
[FONT=arial, sans-serif]Thanks so much for helping me!
After reading all posts of you and other teachers several times I totaly get it now.
[/FONT]:-D
Good night and have a nice dream!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top