Both are grammatically OK, but they mean different things.
Interested in Language
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: time clause
-
Junior Member
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Posts: 77
- Post Thanks / Like
#1 07-Dec-2012, 22:05time clause
Will it be grammatically correct to substitute the Present Perfect for the Present Simple in the time clauses of the following sentences?
When we have had tea, we'll go for a walk.
When we have tea, we'll go for a walk.
Are both of the sentences right or not?
-
VIP Member
Interested in Language
- Join Date: Apr 2009
- Posts: 12,049
- Post Thanks / Like
#2 07-Dec-2012, 22:08Re: time clause
-
Junior Member
Interested in Language
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Posts: 77
- Post Thanks / Like
#3 08-Dec-2012, 00:10Re: time clause
Dear SoothingDave
could you specify the difference in meaning, please?
-
Moderator
English Teacher
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Posts: 37,167
- Post Thanks / Like
#4 08-Dec-2012, 09:38Re: time clause
#1 means we will go for a walk when we have finished having tea.
#2 means we will go for a walk at the same time as having tea (an unlikely situation).
If you replace "When" with "After" in both sentence, they will mean the same as #1.
After we have had tea, we'll go for a walk.
After we have tea, we'll go for a walk.Remember - if you don't use correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing, anything you write will be incorrect.
Similar Threads
-
[Grammar] time clause
By maxi223 in forum Ask a TeacherReplies: 1Last Post: 14-Jun-2010, 16:08 -
time clause
By navi tasan in forum Ask a TeacherReplies: 1Last Post: 27-May-2008, 13:36 -
time clause
By navi tasan in forum Ask a TeacherReplies: 4Last Post: 24-Aug-2004, 20:54 -
time clause
By navi tasan in forum Ask a TeacherReplies: 5Last Post: 21-Aug-2004, 13:45 -
time clause II
By navi tasan in forum Ask a TeacherReplies: 2Last Post: 19-Aug-2004, 22:58
Bookmarks