Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    anhnha's Avatar
    anhnha is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Vietnamese
      • Home Country:
      • Vietnam
      • Current Location:
      • Vietnam
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    542

    who spoke on condition that he not be identified

    The official, who spoke on condition that he not be identified, said the text of the proposed agreement could be released as early as Wednesday.
    More:US, EU agree on food names in anti-counterfeit pact-UPDATE 2
    I think that I understand the meaning of the bold phrase but I feel confused about grammar here.
    Can I rewrite the bold phrase as follows?
    "
    who spoke on condition that he cannot/won't be identified"
    or
    "who spoke on condition that he doesn't be identified"

  2. #2
    philo2009 is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,482

    Re: who spoke on condition that he not be identified

    Quote Originally Posted by anhnha View Post
    The official, who spoke on condition that he not be identified, said the text of the proposed agreement could be released as early as Wednesday.
    More:US, EU agree on food names in anti-counterfeit pact-UPDATE 2
    I think that I understand the meaning of the bold phrase but I feel confused about grammar here.
    Can I rewrite the bold phrase as follows?
    "
    who spoke on condition that he cannot/won't be identified"
    or
    "who spoke on condition that he doesn't be identified"
    The present subjunctive (as "be" here) cannot easily be replaced in AmE, although BrE would accept wouldn't be identified.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •