Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    david11's Avatar
    david11 is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Tamil
      • Home Country:
      • India
      • Current Location:
      • India
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    588

    at the relative cost of vs on the relative cost of


    A: just a bit of gentle leg pulling. and not about jama'at but about the left


    B: I will now meditate
    on the relative costs of my loyalties and leg-pulling :)


    Shouldn't it be "
    at the relative cost of"?

    (It is taken from twitter! I will add tweets preceding these if further context is needed for this question)

  2. #2
    Route21's Avatar
    Route21 is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Thailand
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    914

    Re: at the relative cost of vs on the relative cost of

    As an NES but not a teacher, I would use "meditate on".
    I would not consider using "meditate at".

    Regards
    R21

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •