Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. keannu's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea

    • Join Date: Dec 2010
    • Posts: 5,226
    #1

    as many cattle and to plant as many crops

    1. Do these "as many cattle" and "as many crops" have the implied "as they could" from the previous sentence? I mean, it's normally "as many A as B", so B here is omitted.
    2. By the same token, "as much timber" and "as much toxic waste" would have the same context as 1. As for "get away with", is it related to both "as much timber" and "as much toxic waste" or ""as much toxic waste" only? It's kind of confusing.

    2-5p)It was once in the best economic interests of fishermen to catch all the fish they could from the oceans. Likewise, herdsmen and farmers tried to graze as many cattle and to plant as many crops. In the case of loggers and manufacturers, they wanted to cut down as much timber and dump as much toxic waste as they could get away with. Yet when individuals act independently to maximize profit, they ultimately lose all because every resource is limited and at some point no longer renewable. Then the yield for the individual as well as for society diminishes and may even vanish. This case is called a social trap.

  2. 5jj's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic

    • Join Date: Oct 2010
    • Posts: 28,134
    #2

    Re: as many cattle and to plant as many crops

    Quote Originally Posted by keannu View Post
    1. Do these "as many cattle" and "as many crops" have the implied "as they could" from the previous sentence? I mean, it's normally "as many A as B", so B here is omitted.
    2. By the same token, "as much timber" and "as much toxic waste" would have the same context as 1. As for "get away with", is it related to both "as much timber" and "as much toxic waste" or ""as much toxic waste" only? It's kind of confusing.
    It's not confusing if, as I have suggested before, you use common sense. Most readers are interested in reading the message, and don't worry too much about the words unless there is a glaring error. A careful writer would have written 'as much as they could', though a very thoughtful writer might have deliberately avoided the repetition.

    The reasonable assumption would be that "as much as they could get away with" applies to both products mentioned.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 13-Jan-2011, 07:38
  2. cattle
    By sanalkuzu in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-Aug-2010, 19:26
  3. belly crops and muffler franchise
    By blueeye in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-Mar-2009, 13:10
  4. commercially, commercial crops
    By XINLAI-UE in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-Aug-2008, 04:45
  5. Weeds and Crops
    By Clark in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-Aug-2008, 20:59

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •