Results 1 to 7 of 7
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: May 2004
    • Posts: 39
    #1

    Aggression and invasion

    Dear Teachers,

    What is the difference in meaning and nuance between the words aggression and invasion when one talks of country A's aggression (or invasion) of country B?

    Thank you.

    YY

  1. emsr2d2's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 41,843
    #2

    Re: Aggression and invasion

    Have you looked both up in a dictionary? Please tell us what parts of the definitions of the two words are confusing you.
    Remember - if you don't use correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing, anything you write will be incorrect.

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: May 2004
    • Posts: 39
    #3

    Re: Aggression and invasion

    I admit I have only looked up the Japanese -English dictionary but the Japanese is the same for both and yet some people in Japan insist on using the word "aggression" in connection with our history..but you are correct I should look the words up in the English-English dictionary.

    Thank you.

    YY

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: May 2004
    • Posts: 39
    #4

    Re: Aggression and invasion

    Dear Teacher,

    I have looked the two words up and still do not understand why some people insist on using the word "aggression" rather than "invasion" regarding
    Japanese military action during the war.

    Invasion, according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, is, an act of invading, especially; incursion of an army for conquest or plunder.
    Aggression, also according to the above source, is a forceful action or procedure (as an unprovoked attack) especially when intended to dominate or
    master; the practice of making attacks or encroachments; especially; unprovoked violation by one country of the territorial integrity of another.

    So why is the word "invasion" not acceptable in the context of Japan's history?

    Thank you.

    YY

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: May 2004
    • Posts: 39
    #5

    Re: Aggression and invasion

    Thank you for your reply. Some people in Japan insist that only the word "aggression" should be used in connection with Japan's military operations during World War II ,as in "Japan's aggression against China." They maintain that the expression, "Japan's invasion of China" is not acceptable.
    In the English - Japanese Dictionary , the definition is almost exactly the same for both words.
    I have tried looking up the English-English dictionary and I still do not understand why both expressions cannot be used interchangeably.
    Your reply seems to indicate that the answer is so obvious. I am sorry if I am asking a stupid quesion but would be very grateful if you could explain.

    Thank you

    YY

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Laos

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 57,884
    #6

    Re: Aggression and invasion

    This has to do with perceptions of history. I imagine aggression is used because it sounds less serious than invasion. It's a form of euphemism, just as people sometimes use conflict instead of war.

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Polish
      • Home Country:
      • Poland
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Mar 2007
    • Posts: 524
    #7

    Re: Aggression and invasion

    hi,
    Please note I'm not a teacher nor a native speaker;

    I'm unable to answer why some people might insist on that distinction it could be as Tdol says. I think there is a subtle difference in implicature. An invasion is an act of aggression; but not every act of aggression is an invasion. An invasion also implies entering the invaded country mainland. So I think in some context it could be justified.
    .................................................. .................................................. ...............
    afterthought

    Quote Originally Posted by Tdol View Post
    This has to do with perceptions of history. I imagine aggression is used because it sounds less serious than invasion. It's a form of euphemism, just as people sometimes use conflict instead of war.
    I'm not sure if I could fully agree with that. We would talk about "an invasion of Normandy" but I don't think that anyone would call it "an act of aggression". Taking that to consideration it rather sounds more serious than invasion.

    now I confused even myself

    Is an invasion inherently an act of aggression ? Can one think of aggression as superordinate of invasion ?
    .................................................. .................................................. .................

    Another afterthought;

    I'm sorry for a bit scattered answer but the question really get me thinking. After checking BNC for examples and reading two articles on Wikipedia about invasion and war of aggression it seems to me that there is a difference in the way the terms are used in the context of military operation.

    after wiki on invasion :
    The term does not imply the presence or lack of justification for the action, and the morality or immorality of a military operation does not determine whether it is so termed.
    Whereas aggression implies the lack of justification.
    So long as it is a matter of perceptions of history I definitely wouldn't say that it is used as an euphemism. I would even be inclined to say that the insistence of using aggression instead of invasion in the context of Japan military operation during the WWII is a form of admission of wrongdoing.



    Cheers
    Last edited by Jaskin; 18-May-2013 at 18:29.

Similar Threads

  1. invasion of privacy vs. privacy invasion
    By sunsunmoon in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 21-Sep-2011, 16:20
  2. Invasion vs invader theory
    By arzgol in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16-Jul-2011, 07:10

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •