tzfujimino
Key Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2007
- Member Type
- English Teacher
- Native Language
- Japanese
- Home Country
- Japan
- Current Location
- Japan
Hello.:-D
I have a question as to the usage of the word 'because'.
I teach my students that, in writing assignments, they can't separate the dependent clause introduced by 'because' from the main/independent clause, for instance:
1. I like summer. Because I can enjoy swimming in the sea. [wrong]
2. I like summer because I can enjoy swimming in the sea. [correct]
3. I like summer. This/It/That is because I can enjoy swimming in the sea. [It might not be natural, (#2 is the best) but it's correct.]
And I know the dialogue below is correct (It's an exceptional case in which the dependent clause can stand alone):
4. John: Why do you like summer?
Student A: Because I can enjoy swimming in the sea.
The problem is that one of my students used the construction shown in #3, and that her native English teacher (named 'Richard') at school corrected it to the one shown in #1. I have a strong objection to the correction.
Am I wrong?
Thank you.
I have a question as to the usage of the word 'because'.
I teach my students that, in writing assignments, they can't separate the dependent clause introduced by 'because' from the main/independent clause, for instance:
1. I like summer. Because I can enjoy swimming in the sea. [wrong]
2. I like summer because I can enjoy swimming in the sea. [correct]
3. I like summer. This/It/That is because I can enjoy swimming in the sea. [It might not be natural, (#2 is the best) but it's correct.]
And I know the dialogue below is correct (It's an exceptional case in which the dependent clause can stand alone):
4. John: Why do you like summer?
Student A: Because I can enjoy swimming in the sea.
The problem is that one of my students used the construction shown in #3, and that her native English teacher (named 'Richard') at school corrected it to the one shown in #1. I have a strong objection to the correction.
Am I wrong?
Thank you.