homeless, hungry people were standing / stood in line for food.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Boris Tatarenko

Senior Member
Joined
May 6, 2013
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
It's not a homework.

Beyond Prairie Avenue, where the Glessner house was located, were the factories, the railroad yeards and the slaughethouses of a great industrial city. Beyond, too, were the neighborhoods where homeless, hungry people were standing in line for food. For many times were hard in December 1893.

It's an extract from my exercise book. I need to put a word "stand" into the gap. I put "were standing" but I think "stood" is also correct. Am I right?
Thanks
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
It's not a homework.

Beyond Prairie Avenue, where the Glessner house was located, were the factories, the railroad yeards and the slaughethouses of a great industrial city. Beyond, too, were the neighborhoods where homeless, hungry people were standing in line for food. For many times were hard in December 1893.

It's an extract from my exercise book. I need to put a word "stand" into the gap. I put "were standing" but I think "stood" is also correct. Am I right?
Thanks

Yes "stood" is correct, too. There should be a comma after "For many".
 

Boris Tatarenko

Senior Member
Joined
May 6, 2013
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
Thanks for you reply.
I'd be grateful if you exaplain to me why the comma is required. Just out of interest.
 

Matthew Wai

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2013
Member Type
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
I guess "For many" means "For many people", so a comma is needed.
Not a teacher.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
I guess "For many" means "For many people", so a comma is needed.
Even if we add the word 'people', a comma is till desirable. When we begin a sentence with a subordinate clause or adverbial phrase, we usually follow it with a comma.
 
Last edited:

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
As has been said, 'People were standing in line' and 'People stood in line' are both correct.

However, you'll hear many native speakers incorrectly say 'People were stood in line'.

Similarly, 'People were sitting in rows' and 'People sat in rows' are correct, but 'People were sat in rows' is wrong.
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Thanks for you reply.
I'd be grateful if you exaplain to me why the comma is required. Just out of interest.

The comma is important there to stop readers from stumbling. One could read "many" as an adjective describing "times". [For many times] is a big difference from [For many, times].
 

tzfujimino

Key Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
One could read "many" as an adjective describing "times". [For many times] is a big difference from [For many, times].

I did, at first glance.:oops:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top