I don't love you because you are rich.

Status
Not open for further replies.

tzfujimino

Key Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
Hello.:-D

I have a question about the construction in which "because" is preceded by a negative word.

I don't love you because you are rich.

Does the sentence above mean "I don't love you. The reason is that you are rich"?

I'm sorry if it's a silly question.
(I'd like to ask an additional question later.)
 

Gillnetter

Key Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
No. I love you for other reasons. Your being rich is not the reason for my love.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
It is certainly not a silly question, but a good one.

The sentence is ambiguous. It could have the meaning you suggest, but a clearer way to say that would be "I cannot love you because you are rich." But in everyday speech many people would carelessly say "I don't love you because you are rich" when they were trying to say "Your wealth is not the reason I love you."
 

Roman55

Key Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
France
I am not a teacher.

If you heard it spoken the intonation would make the meaning very clear.
 

tzfujimino

Key Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
Thank you, Gillnetter.:-D

What if the sentence is separated by a comma:

I don't love you, because you are rich.

Does it mean the same as the one in post #1?

Thank you.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Thank you, Gillnetter.:-D

What if the sentence is separated by a comma:

I don't love you, because you are rich.

Does it mean the same as the one in post #1?

Thank you.
With the comma, it means "The reason I don't love you is that you are rich."
But given that even some journalists don't use commas correctly, in writing it can be difficult to tell the meaning.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
It's a nice example of grammatical ambiguity. As Roman55 says, with there being no context, we would need to hear the intonation of the phrase to really understand the meaning.

I would like to compile a collection of ambiguous phrases like this to use as intonation activities with my students. Any more examples very much appreciated.
 

lachdanan

Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Canada
Isn't it better to just say "I love you but not because you are rich"? Of course I mean if you don't have a comma in the middle.
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Yes, far better.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
It's a matter of style, not quality, In speech and in the right written context, "I don't love you because you're rich" is fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top