degree of weakend condition

Status
Not open for further replies.

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
"If Steve is going to travel to Iran, he would be able to get a visa on arrival."
Could I use "would" in the result clause to mean that the outcome in the result clause is not totally certain?
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
It would seem that it is not certain that Steve will travel to Iran. If he does, it is certain that he will get a visa on arrival.
 

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
What I meant is the following. Most nationalities are eligable for a visa on arrival at international airports except for a few. I know that he already bought tickets to Tehran and is going to fly there. But it's not certain if he gets through passport control. So I'm sure about Steve flying there in the if-clause, whereas I reserve a certain degree of uncertainty in the result clause.
 
Last edited:

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
I think bhai understood what you meant. You've got it backwards. Your initial sentence has uncertainty in the 'if' clause, and certainty in the 'then' clause. "If X then Y". You want "X and possibly Y".
Ask yourself this: Why are you using "If" when you know for sure. And why are you using "he would" when there's a chance that he might not?
Do you mean, "When Steve goes to Iran, he will possibly/probably be able to get a visa on arrival"?
In short, the only uncertainty (conditionality) of "would" comes from the "if" clause.
 

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
1)Yes. I mean that he will probably get a visa once gets in at Tehran International. But I'm not totally sure what nationality he holds.

2) Could you also tell me the difference between the following senttences?

"If Steve is going to travel to Iran, he would be able to get a visa on arrival."

AND

"If Steve is going to travel to Iran, he will be able to get a visa on arrival."
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
There is no meaningful difference between them. They both suggest that you know that he will/would get a visa on arrival, which suggests you know his nationality. If you don't know his nationality, then your only real choice is "... he might be able to get a visa on arrival".
 

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
Would "would" in the result clause mean a slight difference in certainty?
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Not for me, no. For me, it would only make sense if the "if" clause was uncertain about him travelling there at all. "Steve's going abroad. I think he said he's going to either Iran or India, he hasn't decided which. If he chose to go to Iran, he would be able to get a visa on arrival. If he chose to go to India, he wouldn't". That still suggests that the speaker knows Steve's nationality and that a visa on arrival is an option which is definitely open to him at one of his potential destinations.
 

Roman55

Key Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
France
I am not a teacher.

Has anyone pointed out that "weakend" isn't a word?

It should be weakened, unless, of course, Steve is going to Iran for the weekend.
 

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
Sorry for the typo. I guess I've probably been a pain in the......throughout the thread. I'm just tryign to understand it. What would a non-meaningful difference be? When I use ''would" in the result clause, am I saying "if Steve is going to ........, I think he should able to get it." ? If I used "will'' instead of "would", would I be saying that he just should be able to get it?
 
Last edited:

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Yes, you can use 'should' here with the meaning of 'would'.
You've confused the matter by introducing the clause with "I think ...". There's a definite difference between, "He should be able to get it" and "He will be able to get it". There's little difference between "I think he should be able to get it" and "I think he will be able to get it."

Remove "I think" from your examples, and you might understand this better. On the other hand, if you are interested in the effect of adding "I think", then concentrate on that; but try not to mix the two.
 

Roman55

Key Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
France
I am not a teacher.

I think part of the problem here is the tenses you are using. I don't see "would" as a conditional at all. I see it as the past of "will".

If you say, "If Steve went to Iran, he would be able to get a visa on arrival", or "If Steve goes to Iran, he will be able to get a visa on arrival" then it seems to me that there is no meaningful difference between them. In both cases the uncertainty is whether or not Steve is actually going to Iran, but if he does go he will get a visa.

You said, "If Steve is going to travel to Iran, he would be able to get a visa on arrival." and this mixture of tenses doesn't sound natural to me. This, in essence, is what bhai said in post #2 and Raymott in post #4.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top