Results 1 to 2 of 2
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Ukrainian
      • Home Country:
      • Ukraine
      • Current Location:
      • Ukraine

    • Join Date: Sep 2010
    • Posts: 3,466
    • Post Thanks / Like

    going to for would in a conditional

    "The involvement - I was not involved directly because they didn't want me to get involved with The Outfit. They only wanted me to be involved with the family, our family. So if there was something that was going to be done for our family, I was going to be involved. If it was something done for The Outfit, I would just stay in the background."

    Should there be '' .., I would be involved."? Why does the speaker use 'going to' for 'would' here?

  1. BobK's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2006
    • Posts: 16,035
    • Post Thanks / Like

    Re: going to for would in a conditional

    'I would be involved' would work grammatically (as 'would' does in the last sentence). I think the speaker said 'I was going to be' in order to spell out the agreement: '[they would ensure that] I was going to be involved'.


Similar Threads

  1. 3rd conditional vs mixed conditional
    By BrunaBC in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28-Oct-2013, 18:29
  2. [Grammar] 3rd conditional or 2nd conditional
    By barnej0096 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29-Sep-2012, 22:49
  3. Conditional
    By rewboss in forum Intermediate
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 16-Jun-2011, 11:00
  4. [Grammar] without as a conditional
    By Swiss88 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-Apr-2010, 16:01


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts