Results 1 to 3 of 3
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Polish
      • Home Country:
      • Poland
      • Current Location:
      • Poland

    • Join Date: Nov 2011
    • Posts: 433
    #1

    ... he would write ...

    In the January, 1993 document containing “Defense Strategy for the 1990s”, Dick Cheney would write: /quotation/. (seen here: http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/arch...an-evaluation/)

    What is the meaning of this "would write"?

    1. He used to write?

    2. He happened to write?

    3. He was (wise, naive, bold, cheeky - depending on context) enough to write?

    4. Something completely different?

    or is this particular nuance of English impossible to explain?

  1. BobK's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2006
    • Posts: 16,038
    #2

    Re: ... he would write ...

    At the time (of the narrative) he was going to write it. In fact he did.

    b

  2. Raymott's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 24,091
    #3

    Re: ... he would write ...

    A few paragraphs later, you have many examples together:

    "These defense plans that embody the Cheney-Powell-Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz (CPRW) strategy would lead to the US war policies of the twenty-first century. They would lead to the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya among others. They would lead to the effort to oust Syria’s government, to sanctions on Iran and Russia, and to drone warfare in Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan. They would lead to the blowback of 9/11 and to the Islamic State. They would lead to the Department of Homeland Security, to the growth of the national security state, and to the TSA. They would lead to confrontation with Russia over Ukraine and to a Pacific “pivot” that confronts China. They would lead to AFRICOM."

    This frequent repetition is meant to have some polemical value. But the use of "would" here is looking forward from a time in the past. This is common in historical writing.
    Another example is:
    "Mozart began composing from the age of five and performed before European royalty. By the age of 17, he would be engaged as a court musician in Salzburg," The biography has not reached age 17 yet. It is a look to the future before going on with the history of his childhood.

    Interestingly, while Mozart began composing at the early age of five, he
    would begin decomposing at the early age of 35.

Similar Threads

  1. [Grammar] All I had to do was to write/was write/was writing.
    By saloom2 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 30-Apr-2013, 07:38
  2. differences between e.g write and write down
    By MR.hypnotizing in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 26-Nov-2011, 16:28
  3. write,write ,write........... And one day?
    By boozl in forum Editing & Writing Topics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-Dec-2010, 12:28
  4. I want to write a sad story? How can I write it? Please Help
    By Karima-19 in forum Editing & Writing Topics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 31-Dec-2008, 21:29
  5. [General] You write potato, I write ghoughpteighbteau
    By englishstudent in forum General Language Discussions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 25-Aug-2008, 12:21

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •