On-time inoculation allows us to decrease the population’s morbidity 1.4-1.7 times

Status
Not open for further replies.

milan2003_07

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
Dear friends,

Below there is a sentence from my technical paper:

"On-time inoculation allows us to decrease the population’s morbidity 1.4-1.7 times or even more, reduce the death rate from influenza and influenza-associated death rate from somatic diseases".

I have a few questions about this sentence:

1) Is "on-time" coorect her? The intended meaning is inoculation given before the beginning (outbreak of the epidemics).

2) Do I need any preposition between "morbidity" and "1.4-1.7 times"? For example, "morbidity by 1.4-1.7 times".

3) Does "influenza-assocoiated" sound fine here?

Thanks
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
1. Yes.
2. No, not needed.
3. Yes.

Your original sentence would be better as two sentences.

"On-time inoculation allows us to decrease the population’s morbidity 1.4-1.7 times or even more. It also reduces the death rate from influenza and influenza-associated death rate from somatic diseases".
 

Roman55

Key Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
France
I am not a teacher.

Here's another opinion.

1. I'd prefer 'timely'.
2. Yes, use 'by'.
3. Yes.

The two-sentence version is better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top